Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319312AbSIFSiv>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:38:51 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319316AbSIFSiv>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:38:51 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:64390 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S319312AbSIFSiu>;
	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:38:50 -0400
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20020906.113611.102227888.davem@redhat.com>
To: Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com
Cc: gh@us.ibm.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <60449712.1031311608@[10.10.2.3]>
References: <E17nNhM-0003PD-00@w-gerrit2>
	<60449712.1031311608@[10.10.2.3]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 668
Lines: 15

   From: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
   Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:26:49 -0700
   
   The fact that we're doing something different from everyone else
   and turning up a different set of kernel issues is a good thing, 
   to my mind. You're right, we could use Tux if we wanted to ... but
   that doesn't stop Apache being interesting ;-)

Tux does not obviate Apache from the equation.
See my other emails.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/