Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:39:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:39:34 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:1159 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:39:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020906.113652.40767574.davem@redhat.com> To: haveblue@us.ibm.com Cc: ak@suse.de, Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3D78F4E6.3020101@us.ibm.com> References: <3D78E7A5.7050306@us.ibm.com> <20020906202646.A2185@wotan.suse.de> <3D78F4E6.3020101@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 615 Lines: 14 From: Dave Hansen Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:33:10 -0700 Actually, oprofile separated out the acenic module from the rest of the kernel. I should have included that breakout as well. but it was only 1.3 of CPU: 1.3801 0.0000 /lib/modules/2.4.18+O1/kernel/drivers/net/acenic.o We thought you were using e1000 in these tests? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/