Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:46:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:46:22 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:9095 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 14:46:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020906.114336.132077566.davem@redhat.com> To: Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com Cc: haveblue@us.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <61557945.1031312716@[10.10.2.3]> References: <20020906.113652.40767574.davem@redhat.com> <61557945.1031312716@[10.10.2.3]> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 913 Lines: 22 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:45:17 -0700 > Actually, oprofile separated out the acenic module from the rest of the > kernel. I should have included that breakout as well. but it was only 1.3 > of CPU: > 1.3801 0.0000 /lib/modules/2.4.18+O1/kernel/drivers/net/acenic.o > > We thought you were using e1000 in these tests? e1000 on the server, those profiles were client side. Ok. BTW acenic is packet rate limited by the speed of the MIPS cpus on the card. It might be instramental to disable HW checksumming in the acenic driver and see what this does to your results. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/