Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S319340AbSIFTDl>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:03:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S319341AbSIFTDl>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:03:41 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:26247 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S319340AbSIFTDk>;
	Fri, 6 Sep 2002 15:03:40 -0400
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20020906.120104.125944656.davem@redhat.com>
To: gh@us.ibm.com
Cc: Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, niv@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <E17nOQ8-0003a8-00@w-gerrit2>
References: <20020906.114815.127906065.davem@redhat.com>
	<E17nOQ8-0003a8-00@w-gerrit2>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 661
Lines: 14

   From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
   Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 12:05:27 -0700
   
   So, any comments I made which might have implied that Tux/Tux2 made things
   worse have no substantiated data to prove that and it is quite possible
   that there is no such problem.  Also, this was run nearly a year ago and
   the state of Tux/Tux2 might have been a bit different at the time.

Thanks for clearing things up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/