2013-04-18 20:59:30

by Bill Nottingham

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mei: reseting -> resetting

This enum leaks out to userspace via error messages, so fix the spelling.

Signed-off-by: Bill Nottingham <[email protected]>
---
drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c | 2 +-
drivers/misc/mei/init.c | 4 ++--
drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c
index fb9e63b..e02d4cf 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hbm.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void mei_hbm_me_cl_allocate(struct mei_device *dev)
sizeof(struct mei_me_client), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!clients) {
dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "memory allocation for ME clients failed.\n");
- dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETING;
+ dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETTING;
mei_reset(dev, 1);
return;
}
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void mei_hbm_start_req(struct mei_device *dev)
dev->recvd_msg = false;
if (mei_write_message(dev, mei_hdr, dev->wr_msg.data)) {
dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev, "write send version message to FW fail.\n");
- dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETING;
+ dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETTING;
mei_reset(dev, 1);
}
dev->init_clients_state = MEI_START_MESSAGE;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void mei_hbm_enum_clients_req(struct mei_device *dev)
enum_req->hbm_cmd = HOST_ENUM_REQ_CMD;

if (mei_write_message(dev, mei_hdr, dev->wr_msg.data)) {
- dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETING;
+ dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETTING;
dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev, "write send enumeration request message to FW fail.\n");
mei_reset(dev, 1);
}
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int mei_hbm_prop_req(struct mei_device *dev)
prop_req->address = next_client_index;

if (mei_write_message(dev, mei_hdr, dev->wr_msg.data)) {
- dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETING;
+ dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETTING;
dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "Properties request command failed\n");
mei_reset(dev, 1);

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c b/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c
index 642c622..4460a3e 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/hw-me.c
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ irqreturn_t mei_me_irq_thread_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)

/* check if ME wants a reset */
if (!mei_hw_is_ready(dev) &&
- dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_RESETING &&
+ dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_RESETTING &&
dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_INITIALIZING) {
dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev, "FW not ready.\n");
mei_reset(dev, 1);
diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/init.c b/drivers/misc/mei/init.c
index 3561799..cb58f72 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/init.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/init.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ const char *mei_dev_state_str(int state)
MEI_DEV_STATE(INITIALIZING);
MEI_DEV_STATE(INIT_CLIENTS);
MEI_DEV_STATE(ENABLED);
- MEI_DEV_STATE(RESETING);
+ MEI_DEV_STATE(RESETTING);
MEI_DEV_STATE(DISABLED);
MEI_DEV_STATE(RECOVERING_FROM_RESET);
MEI_DEV_STATE(POWER_DOWN);
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ void mei_reset(struct mei_device *dev, int interrupts_enabled)
if (dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_INITIALIZING) {
if (dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_DISABLED &&
dev->dev_state != MEI_DEV_POWER_DOWN)
- dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETING;
+ dev->dev_state = MEI_DEV_RESETTING;

mei_cl_all_disconnect(dev);

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h b/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h
index 9787381..77a584b 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/mei_dev.h
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ enum mei_dev_state {
MEI_DEV_INITIALIZING = 0,
MEI_DEV_INIT_CLIENTS,
MEI_DEV_ENABLED,
- MEI_DEV_RESETING,
+ MEI_DEV_RESETTING,
MEI_DEV_DISABLED,
MEI_DEV_RECOVERING_FROM_RESET,
MEI_DEV_POWER_DOWN,
--
1.8.1.4


2013-04-18 21:01:32

by Tomas Winkler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mei: reseting -> resetting

>
> This enum leaks out to userspace via error messages, so fix the spelling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Nottingham <[email protected]>
ACK
Tomas

2013-04-19 17:58:49

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mei: reseting -> resetting

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 09:01:25PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > This enum leaks out to userspace via error messages, so fix the spelling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bill Nottingham <[email protected]>
> ACK

Why do you ack a patch that doesn't apply? :)

thanks,

greg k-h

2013-04-19 18:20:21

by Tomas Winkler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mei: reseting -> resetting


>
> Why do you ack a patch that doesn't apply? :)

Sorry for that didn't check it much ...it was just spelling which others are obviously better in than me.
Anyhow I took a liberty to rebase it myself


Thanks
Tomas