On 04/22/2013 05:15 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> (It turns out that any use of "UINT_MAX" for a "long" value also results in
> this warning, because we define it as "~0ul", so there are other cases of
> spurious things where we *intentionally* drop the high bits).
I'm responsible for this particular piece of drain bramage... we should
probably just open-code the correct types conditional on the sizes like