2002-09-29 03:44:09

by Zach Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] vma->shared list_head initializations

more list_head debugging carnage. This time it was proc_pid_statm()
trying to do list_empty() on vma->shared in various bad ways. First
were head and next containing slab poison. with that fixed, it was then
dying with a vma->shared pointing to a valid list that it wasn't a
member of. I guessed that this was because we hadn't cleared it when we
copied it whole-sale from another vma when it was allocated. sure
enough, the attached patch makes ps run without exploding.

Andrew, am I on to something? If the attached patch isn't insane, can
you marshall it and the previous list_head init fix on to linus?

There are probably still arch vma allocators that are doing it wrong,
but I didn't look.

in any case, I think I'll submit the list_head debugging patch. It
seems to do good things, and is prefaced on CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST_HEAD..
and the system appears to run fine with this and the previous fix
applied.

- z

--- linux-2.5.39/fs/exec.c.fmuta Sat Sep 28 19:50:20 2002
+++ linux-2.5.39/fs/exec.c Sat Sep 28 19:51:08 2002
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@
mpnt->vm_ops = NULL;
mpnt->vm_pgoff = 0;
mpnt->vm_file = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mpnt->shared);
mpnt->vm_private_data = (void *) 0;
insert_vm_struct(mm, mpnt);
mm->total_vm = (mpnt->vm_end - mpnt->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
--- linux-2.5.39/kernel/fork.c.fmuta Sat Sep 28 19:26:32 2002
+++ linux-2.5.39/kernel/fork.c Sat Sep 28 20:33:56 2002
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@
tmp->vm_mm = mm;
tmp->vm_next = NULL;
file = tmp->vm_file;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp->shared);
if (file) {
struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
get_file(file);
--- linux-2.5.39/mm/mmap.c.fmuta Sat Sep 28 19:38:57 2002
+++ linux-2.5.39/mm/mmap.c Sat Sep 28 20:35:05 2002
@@ -553,6 +553,7 @@
vma->vm_file = NULL;
vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
vma->vm_raend = 0;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->shared);

if (file) {
error = -EINVAL;
@@ -1052,6 +1053,8 @@
/* most fields are the same, copy all, and then fixup */
*new = *vma;

+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new->shared);
+
if (new_below) {
new->vm_end = addr;
vma->vm_start = addr;
@@ -1215,6 +1218,7 @@
vma->vm_pgoff = 0;
vma->vm_file = NULL;
vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->shared);

vma_link(mm, vma, prev, rb_link, rb_parent);

--- linux-2.5.39/mm/mremap.c.fmuta Sat Sep 28 20:35:32 2002
+++ linux-2.5.39/mm/mremap.c Sat Sep 28 20:35:51 2002
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@
if (!move_page_tables(vma, new_addr, addr, old_len)) {
if (allocated_vma) {
*new_vma = *vma;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_vma->shared);
new_vma->vm_start = new_addr;
new_vma->vm_end = new_addr+new_len;
new_vma->vm_pgoff += (addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;


2002-09-29 04:44:07

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vma->shared list_head initializations

Zach Brown wrote:
>
> more list_head debugging carnage.
>

yup

> --- linux-2.5.39/fs/exec.c.fmuta Sat Sep 28 19:50:20 2002
> +++ linux-2.5.39/fs/exec.c Sat Sep 28 19:51:08 2002
> @@ -400,6 +400,7 @@
> mpnt->vm_ops = NULL;
> mpnt->vm_pgoff = 0;
> mpnt->vm_file = NULL;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mpnt->shared);
> mpnt->vm_private_data = (void *) 0;
> insert_vm_struct(mm, mpnt);
> mm->total_vm = (mpnt->vm_end - mpnt->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

Fair enough, short-term. But what your patch is really saying
is "this code stinks".

We need to lose all those open-coded accesses to vm_area_cachep,
give that cache a constructor and possibly write some helper
functions. To lose all this fragile "did I remember to
initialise everything and has anyone added any more fields
since I wrote that code" gunk.

<looks hopefully at Christoph>