Hi,
perf-annotate has little bugs so I fix them.
I'd appreciate some feedback on this patchset. :)
Thanks,
Taeung
v3:
- rebased on current acme/perf/core
v2:
- more clearly commit log messages (Arnaldo)
- rebased on current acme/perf/core
Taeung Song (3):
perf annotate: Fix a bug reading link name from a build-id file
perf annotate: Fix a bug of division by zero when calculating percent
perf annotate: Fix missing number of samples
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
If running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
Before:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
...
0 : 400816: push %rbp
0 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
0 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
0 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
0 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
...
The reason is number of samples aren't set
in symbol__get_source_line(). so set it ordinarily.
After:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
...
3 : 400816: push %rbp
4 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
1 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
2 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
1 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
...
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++++--
tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 11af5f0..a37032b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start);
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- u64 offset;
+ u64 offset, nr_samples;
double percent_max = 0.0;
src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
@@ -1674,12 +1674,14 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
double percent = 0.0;
h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
+ nr_samples = h->addr[i];
if (h->sum)
- percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
+ percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->sum;
if (percent > percent_max)
percent_max = percent;
src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
+ src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples;
}
if (percent_max <= 0.5)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
index 09776b5..948aa8e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cyc_hist {
struct source_line_samples {
double percent;
double percent_sum;
- double nr;
+ u64 nr;
};
struct source_line {
--
2.7.4
It is wrong way to read link name from a build-id file.
Because a build-id file is not symbolic link
but build-id directory of it is symbolic link, so fix it.
For example, if build-id file name gotten from
dso__build_id_filename() is as below,
/root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1/elf
To correctly read link name of build-id,
use the build-id dir path that is a symbolic link,
instead of the above build-id file name like below.
/root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 3d0263e..6dc9148 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1307,6 +1307,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
{
char linkname[PATH_MAX];
char *build_id_filename;
+ char *build_id_path = NULL;
if (dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
!dso__is_kcore(dso))
@@ -1322,8 +1323,14 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
goto fallback;
}
+ build_id_path = strdup(filename);
+ if (!build_id_path)
+ return -1;
+
+ dirname(build_id_path);
+
if (dso__is_kcore(dso) ||
- readlink(filename, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
+ readlink(build_id_path, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
strstr(linkname, DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) ||
access(filename, R_OK)) {
fallback:
@@ -1335,6 +1342,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
__symbol__join_symfs(filename, filename_size, dso->long_name);
}
+ free(build_id_path);
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
Currently perf-annotate with --print-line can print
-nan(0x8000000000000) because of division by zero
when calculating percent. The division by zero happen
when a sum of samples is zero in symbol__get_source_line(),
so fix it.
For examples,
After running 'perf record' like below,
$ perf record -e "{cycles,page-faults,branch-misses}" ./a.out
Before:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l
Sorted summary for file /home/taeung/workspace/a.out
----------------------------------------------
32.89 -nan 7.04 a.c:38
25.14 -nan 0.00 a.c:34
16.26 -nan 56.34 a.c:31
15.88 -nan 1.41 a.c:37
5.67 -nan 0.00 a.c:39
1.13 -nan 35.21 a.c:26
0.95 -nan 0.00 a.c:44
0.57 -nan 0.00 a.c:32
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of a.out for cycles (529 samples)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
...
a.c:26 0.57 -nan 4.23 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
a.c:26 0.00 -nan 9.86 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
...
However, if a sum of samples is zero (e.g. 'page-faults'),
skip calculating percent.
After:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l
Sorted summary for file /home/taeung/workspace/a.out
----------------------------------------------
32.89 0.00 7.04 a.c:38
25.14 0.00 0.00 a.c:34
16.26 0.00 56.34 a.c:31
15.88 0.00 1.41 a.c:37
5.67 0.00 0.00 a.c:39
1.13 0.00 35.21 a.c:26
0.95 0.00 0.00 a.c:44
0.57 0.00 0.00 a.c:32
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of old for cycles (529 samples)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
...
a.c:26 0.57 0.00 4.23 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
a.c:26 0.00 0.00 9.86 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
...
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 6dc9148..11af5f0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1671,11 +1671,15 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
for (k = 0; k < nr_pcnt; k++) {
+ double percent = 0.0;
+
h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
- src_line->samples[k].percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
+ if (h->sum)
+ percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
- if (src_line->samples[k].percent > percent_max)
- percent_max = src_line->samples[k].percent;
+ if (percent > percent_max)
+ percent_max = percent;
+ src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
}
if (percent_max <= 0.5)
--
2.7.4
Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:36PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> It is wrong way to read link name from a build-id file.
> Because a build-id file is not symbolic link
> but build-id directory of it is symbolic link, so fix it.
Ok, applied, in the past it was always a symlink, but the following cset
changed that, so I added:
Fixes: 01412261d994 ("perf buildid-cache: Use path/to/bin/buildid/elf instead of path/to/bin/buildid")
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
> For example, if build-id file name gotten from
> dso__build_id_filename() is as below,
>
> /root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1/elf
>
> To correctly read link name of build-id,
> use the build-id dir path that is a symbolic link,
> instead of the above build-id file name like below.
>
> /root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1
>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 3d0263e..6dc9148 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -1307,6 +1307,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> {
> char linkname[PATH_MAX];
> char *build_id_filename;
> + char *build_id_path = NULL;
>
> if (dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
> !dso__is_kcore(dso))
> @@ -1322,8 +1323,14 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> goto fallback;
> }
>
> + build_id_path = strdup(filename);
> + if (!build_id_path)
> + return -1;
> +
> + dirname(build_id_path);
> +
> if (dso__is_kcore(dso) ||
> - readlink(filename, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
> + readlink(build_id_path, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
> strstr(linkname, DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) ||
> access(filename, R_OK)) {
> fallback:
> @@ -1335,6 +1342,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> __symbol__join_symfs(filename, filename_size, dso->long_name);
> }
>
> + free(build_id_path);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:38PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> If running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
>
> Before:
> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
> ...
> 0 : 400816: push %rbp
> 0 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
> 0 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
> 0 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
> 0 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
> ...
>
> The reason is number of samples aren't set
> in symbol__get_source_line(). so set it ordinarily.
Can you please take a look at:
0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with --show-total-period")
that introduced the --show-total-period code and take it into account in
this fix?
I.e. from a quick look it did the calculation setting that field in the
TUI code, where it should have done in the util/annotate.c file, so that
all UIs would be able to use it.
After your analysis, please add a Fixes: that cset, ok?
I applied the other two patches and added Martin to the CC list, as he
is the author of that patch and may have something to say here.
- Arnaldo
> After:
> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
> ...
> 3 : 400816: push %rbp
> 4 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
> 1 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
> 2 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
> 1 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
> ...
>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++++--
> tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index 11af5f0..a37032b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
> start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start);
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> - u64 offset;
> + u64 offset, nr_samples;
> double percent_max = 0.0;
>
> src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
> @@ -1674,12 +1674,14 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
> double percent = 0.0;
>
> h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
> + nr_samples = h->addr[i];
> if (h->sum)
> - percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
> + percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->sum;
>
> if (percent > percent_max)
> percent_max = percent;
> src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
> + src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples;
> }
>
> if (percent_max <= 0.5)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> index 09776b5..948aa8e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cyc_hist {
> struct source_line_samples {
> double percent;
> double percent_sum;
> - double nr;
> + u64 nr;
> };
>
> struct source_line {
> --
> 2.7.4
Commit-ID: 6ebd2547dd24daf95a21b2bc59931de8502afcc3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6ebd2547dd24daf95a21b2bc59931de8502afcc3
Author: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:10:36 +0900
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:58:20 -0300
perf annotate: Fix a bug following symbolic link of a build-id file
It is wrong way to read link name from a build-id file. Because a
build-id file is not anymore a symbolic link but build-id directory of
it is symbolic link, so fix it.
For example, if build-id file name gotten from
dso__build_id_filename() is as below,
/root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1/elf
To correctly read link name of build-id, use the build-id dir path that
is a symbolic link, instead of the above build-id file name like below.
/root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 01412261d994 ("perf buildid-cache: Use path/to/bin/buildid/elf instead of path/to/bin/buildid")
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 3d0263e..6dc9148 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1307,6 +1307,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
{
char linkname[PATH_MAX];
char *build_id_filename;
+ char *build_id_path = NULL;
if (dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
!dso__is_kcore(dso))
@@ -1322,8 +1323,14 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
goto fallback;
}
+ build_id_path = strdup(filename);
+ if (!build_id_path)
+ return -1;
+
+ dirname(build_id_path);
+
if (dso__is_kcore(dso) ||
- readlink(filename, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
+ readlink(build_id_path, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
strstr(linkname, DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) ||
access(filename, R_OK)) {
fallback:
@@ -1335,6 +1342,7 @@ fallback:
__symbol__join_symfs(filename, filename_size, dso->long_name);
}
+ free(build_id_path);
return 0;
}
Commit-ID: 2e933b1274dc89cd1629f6c7fd9bf952248d84c2
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2e933b1274dc89cd1629f6c7fd9bf952248d84c2
Author: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:10:37 +0900
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
CommitDate: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:04:56 -0300
perf annotate: Fix a bug of division by zero when calculating percent
Currently perf-annotate with --print-line can print
-nan(0x8000000000000) because of division by zero when calculating
percent. The division by zero happens when a sum of samples is zero in
symbol__get_source_line(), so fix it.
For example:
After running 'perf record' like below,
$ perf record -e "{cycles,page-faults,branch-misses}" ./a.out
Before:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l
Sorted summary for file /home/taeung/workspace/a.out
----------------------------------------------
32.89 -nan 7.04 a.c:38
25.14 -nan 0.00 a.c:34
16.26 -nan 56.34 a.c:31
15.88 -nan 1.41 a.c:37
5.67 -nan 0.00 a.c:39
1.13 -nan 35.21 a.c:26
0.95 -nan 0.00 a.c:44
0.57 -nan 0.00 a.c:32
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of a.out for cycles (529 samples)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
...
a.c:26 0.57 -nan 4.23 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
a.c:26 0.00 -nan 9.86 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
...
However, if a sum of samples is zero (e.g. 'page-faults'),
skip calculating percent.
After:
$ perf annotate --stdio -l
Sorted summary for file /home/taeung/workspace/a.out
----------------------------------------------
32.89 0.00 7.04 a.c:38
25.14 0.00 0.00 a.c:34
16.26 0.00 56.34 a.c:31
15.88 0.00 1.41 a.c:37
5.67 0.00 0.00 a.c:39
1.13 0.00 35.21 a.c:26
0.95 0.00 0.00 a.c:44
0.57 0.00 0.00 a.c:32
Percent | Source code & Disassembly of old for cycles (529 samples)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
...
a.c:26 0.57 0.00 4.23 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
a.c:26 0.00 0.00 9.86 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
...
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 6dc9148..11af5f0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1671,11 +1671,15 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, struct map *map,
src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
for (k = 0; k < nr_pcnt; k++) {
+ double percent = 0.0;
+
h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
- src_line->samples[k].percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
+ if (h->sum)
+ percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
- if (src_line->samples[k].percent > percent_max)
- percent_max = src_line->samples[k].percent;
+ if (percent > percent_max)
+ percent_max = percent;
+ src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
}
if (percent_max <= 0.5)
On 03/28/2017 03:01 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:36PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> It is wrong way to read link name from a build-id file.
>> Because a build-id file is not symbolic link
>> but build-id directory of it is symbolic link, so fix it.
>
> Ok, applied, in the past it was always a symlink, but the following cset
> changed that, so I added:
>
> Fixes: 01412261d994 ("perf buildid-cache: Use path/to/bin/buildid/elf instead of path/to/bin/buildid")
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Arnaldo
Thank you!
- Taeung
>
>> For example, if build-id file name gotten from
>> dso__build_id_filename() is as below,
>>
>> /root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1/elf
>>
>> To correctly read link name of build-id,
>> use the build-id dir path that is a symbolic link,
>> instead of the above build-id file name like below.
>>
>> /root/.debug/.build-id/4f/75c7d197c951659d1c1b8b5fd49bcdf8f3f8b1
>>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> index 3d0263e..6dc9148 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>> @@ -1307,6 +1307,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> {
>> char linkname[PATH_MAX];
>> char *build_id_filename;
>> + char *build_id_path = NULL;
>>
>> if (dso->symtab_type == DSO_BINARY_TYPE__KALLSYMS &&
>> !dso__is_kcore(dso))
>> @@ -1322,8 +1323,14 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> goto fallback;
>> }
>>
>> + build_id_path = strdup(filename);
>> + if (!build_id_path)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + dirname(build_id_path);
>> +
>> if (dso__is_kcore(dso) ||
>> - readlink(filename, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
>> + readlink(build_id_path, linkname, sizeof(linkname)) < 0 ||
>> strstr(linkname, DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) ||
>> access(filename, R_OK)) {
>> fallback:
>> @@ -1335,6 +1342,7 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
>> __symbol__join_symfs(filename, filename_size, dso->long_name);
>> }
>>
>> + free(build_id_path);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
Good morning, Arnaldo :)
On 03/28/2017 03:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:38PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> If running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
>> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
>>
>> Before:
>> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
>> ...
>> 0 : 400816: push %rbp
>> 0 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
>> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
>> 0 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
>> 0 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
>> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
>> 0 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
>> ...
>>
>> The reason is number of samples aren't set
>> in symbol__get_source_line(). so set it ordinarily.
>
> Can you please take a look at:
>
> 0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with --show-total-period")
>
> that introduced the --show-total-period code and take it into account in
> this fix?
>
> I.e. from a quick look it did the calculation setting that field in the
> TUI code, where it should have done in the util/annotate.c file, so that
> all UIs would be able to use it.
>
> After your analysis, please add a Fixes: that cset, ok?
>
> I applied the other two patches and added Martin to the CC list, as he
> is the author of that patch and may have something to say here.
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Okey! I look into the cset 0c4a5bcea460.
It is fine but if running 'show-total-period' with '-l',
the problem happen. The reason is to miss setting number of samples
for source_line_samples, so will send v4 added Fixes: and Cc: Martin
(and a bit changed commit log message)
Thanks,
Taeung
On 03/28/2017 09:09 PM, Taeung Song wrote:
> Good morning, Arnaldo :)
>
> On 03/28/2017 03:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 04:10:38PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>> If running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
>>> you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.
>>>
>>> Before:
>>> $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
>>> ...
>>> 0 : 400816: push %rbp
>>> 0 : 400817: mov %rsp,%rbp
>>> 0 : 40081a: mov %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
>>> 0 : 40081d: mov %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
>>> 0 : 400821: mov -0x24(%rbp),%eax
>>> 0 : 400824: mov -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
>>> 0 : 400828: mov (%rdx),%esi
>>> 0 : 40082a: mov $0x0,%edx
>>> ...
>>>
>>> The reason is number of samples aren't set
>>> in symbol__get_source_line(). so set it ordinarily.
>>
>> Can you please take a look at:
>>
>> 0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with
>> --show-total-period")
>>
>> that introduced the --show-total-period code and take it into account in
>> this fix?
>>
>> I.e. from a quick look it did the calculation setting that field in the
>> TUI code, where it should have done in the util/annotate.c file, so that
>> all UIs would be able to use it.
>>
Sorry, I misunderstood what you said.
Already there is the calculation setting in util/annotate.c
Because of the cset e64aa75bf5 ("perf annotate browser: Use
disasm__calc_percent()") by Namhyung.
So I think that we don't need to do as you guess.
Thanks,
Taeung
>> After your analysis, please add a Fixes: that cset, ok?
>>
>> I applied the other two patches and added Martin to the CC list, as he
>> is the author of that patch and may have something to say here.
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>
> Okey! I look into the cset 0c4a5bcea460.
>
> It is fine but if running 'show-total-period' with '-l',
> the problem happen. The reason is to miss setting number of samples
> for source_line_samples, so will send v4 added Fixes: and Cc: Martin
> (and a bit changed commit log message)
>
> Thanks,
> Taeung