2019-07-10 02:35:04

by Hariprasad Kelam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] sound: pci: lx6464es: Remove unneeded variable err

This patch fixes below issue reported by coccicheck
sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c:256:5-8: Unneeded variable: "err". Return
"0" on line 258

We cannot change return value as its registered with snd_pcm_ops->close

Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
---
sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
index 1771a6d..583ca73 100644
--- a/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
+++ b/sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c
@@ -253,9 +253,8 @@ static int lx_pcm_open(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)

static int lx_pcm_close(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
{
- int err = 0;
dev_dbg(substream->pcm->card->dev, "->lx_pcm_close\n");
- return err;
+ return 0;
}

static snd_pcm_uframes_t lx_pcm_stream_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream
--
2.7.4


2019-07-10 10:08:17

by Takashi Iwai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: pci: lx6464es: Remove unneeded variable err

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:30:59 +0200,
Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
>
> This patch fixes below issue reported by coccicheck
> sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c:256:5-8: Unneeded variable: "err". Return
> "0" on line 258
>
> We cannot change return value as its registered with snd_pcm_ops->close
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>

Applied, thanks.


Takashi

2019-07-10 10:09:42

by Takashi Iwai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: pci: lx6464es: Remove unneeded variable err

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:49:31 +0200,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:30:59 +0200,
> Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> >
> > This patch fixes below issue reported by coccicheck
> > sound/pci/lx6464es/lx6464es.c:256:5-8: Unneeded variable: "err". Return
> > "0" on line 258
> >
> > We cannot change return value as its registered with snd_pcm_ops->close
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
>
> Applied, thanks.

Well, looking at the description above again, I'd drop the text

"We cannot change return value as its registered with
snd_pcm_ops->close"

because this is quite misleading. There is absolutely no need for
changing the function return type.


thanks,

Takashi