LinuxLists.cc - [PATCH] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem

2020-01-06 04:12:14

Subject: [PATCH] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem_add()

On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used
outside of memblock.

Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Collin Walling <[email protected]>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>
Cc: Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>
---
Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
on a real system.

Changes from RFC:

- Dropped all memblock_dbg() changes per Mike
- Renamed memblock_physmem() as memblock_physmem_add() per Mike
- Made memblock_add_range() a static function per Mike
- Updated the commit message

RFC: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11316627/)

arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++---------
include/linux/memblock.h | 7 +++----
mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
index b9104ae162f4..424cb8fd2c35 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -762,14 +762,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
memblock_free(start, size);
}

-static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
-{
- memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
- start, start + size - 1);
- memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
- memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
-}
-
static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
{
switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
@@ -794,8 +786,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
/* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
- for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
+ for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
+ memblock_add(start, end - start);
memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
+ }
memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
memblock_dump_all();
}
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index b38bbefabfab..079d17d96410 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
+int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+#endif
void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
@@ -127,10 +130,6 @@ void reset_node_managed_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat);
void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void);

/* Low level functions */
-int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
- phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
- int nid, enum memblock_flags flags);
-
void __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags,
struct memblock_type *type_a,
struct memblock_type *type_b, phys_addr_t *out_start,
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 4bc2c7d8bf42..fc0d4db1d646 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type,
* Return:
* 0 on success, -errno on failure.
*/
-int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
+static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
int nid, enum memblock_flags flags)
{
@@ -830,6 +830,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
+int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+ phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
+
+ memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
+ &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
+
+ return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
+}
+#endif
+
/**
* memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
* @base: base address of the region
--
2.20.1

2020-01-06 06:32:32

by Mike Rapoport

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem_add()

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:40:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
> into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
> used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
> physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
> instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
> Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used
> outside of memblock.
>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
> Cc: Collin Walling <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]>
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>

> ---
> Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
> on a real system.
>
> Changes from RFC:
>
> - Dropped all memblock_dbg() changes per Mike
> - Renamed memblock_physmem() as memblock_physmem_add() per Mike
> - Made memblock_add_range() a static function per Mike
> - Updated the commit message
>
> RFC: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11316627/)
>
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++---------
> include/linux/memblock.h | 7 +++----
> mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> index b9104ae162f4..424cb8fd2c35 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -762,14 +762,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
> memblock_free(start, size);
> }
>
> -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
> - start, start + size - 1);
> - memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
> - memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
> -}
> -
> static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
> {
> switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
> @@ -794,8 +786,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
> get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
> /* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
> memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
> - for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
> + for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
> + memblock_add(start, end - start);
> memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
> + }
> memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
> memblock_dump_all();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index b38bbefabfab..079d17d96410 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
> void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
> bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> @@ -127,10 +130,6 @@ void reset_node_managed_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat);
> void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void);
>
> /* Low level functions */
> -int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
> - phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> - int nid, enum memblock_flags flags);
> -
> void __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags,
> struct memblock_type *type_a,
> struct memblock_type *type_b, phys_addr_t *out_start,
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 4bc2c7d8bf42..fc0d4db1d646 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> * Return:
> * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> */
> -int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
> +static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type,
> phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> int nid, enum memblock_flags flags)
> {
> @@ -830,6 +830,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
> +
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> + &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> +
> + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
> * @base: base address of the region
> --
> 2.20.1
>

--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

2020-01-07 17:44:35

by Heiko Carstens

[permalink] [raw]