On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
> Some further information in response to a private email, I did hdparm -ti
> under both
> 2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
> w/extended partitions...
What nonsense. There is nothing special with extended partitions.
Partitions influence the logical view on the disk, but not I/O.
(But the outer rim of a disk is faster than the inner side.)
Moreover, you report elapsed times
0:27, 0:22, 0:24, 0:28, 0:21, 0:24, 0:27
where is this performance hit?
It seems to be the output of vmstat that isn't matching things. First it
says
it's getting near 10M/s, but if you divide 128M/27 seconds, it's more like
4.7.
So where is the time being wasted? It's not in cpu either.
Now I look at hda7 where vmstat reported 2000-3000 blocks/sec. Again, the
math
says it's a rate near 5m/s. So it still doesn't make sense.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
> To: LA Walsh
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my HW - more info
> - maybe extended partitions
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
>
> > Some further information in response to a private email, I did
> hdparm -ti
> > under both
> > 2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
> > w/extended partitions...
>
> What nonsense. There is nothing special with extended partitions.
> Partitions influence the logical view on the disk, but not I/O.
>
> (But the outer rim of a disk is faster than the inner side.)
>
> Moreover, you report elapsed times
> 0:27, 0:22, 0:24, 0:28, 0:21, 0:24, 0:27
> where is this performance hit?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
It seems to be the output of vmstat that isn't matching things. First it
says
it's getting near 10M/s, but if you divide 128M/27 seconds, it's more like
4.7.
So where is the time being wasted? It's not in cpu either.
Now lets look at hda7 where vmstat reported 2-3meg/sec. Again, the math
says it's a rate near 5. So it still doesn't make sense.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Andries Brouwer
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 4:59 PM
> To: LA Walsh
> Cc: lkml
> Subject: Re: IDE0 /dev/hda performance hit in 2217 on my HW - more info
> - maybe extended partitions
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:47:27PM -0800, LA Walsh wrote:
>
> > Some further information in response to a private email, I did
> hdparm -ti
> > under both
> > 2216 and 2217 -- they are identical -- this may be something weird
> > w/extended partitions...
>
> What nonsense. There is nothing special with extended partitions.
> Partitions influence the logical view on the disk, but not I/O.
>
> (But the outer rim of a disk is faster than the inner side.)
>
> Moreover, you report elapsed times
> 0:27, 0:22, 0:24, 0:28, 0:21, 0:24, 0:27
> where is this performance hit?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Hi Linda,
Are you having variable transfer rates based on the zone access point?
If this is the case it is correctly reporting slow on the ID of the LBA
range v/s the OD on the media.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development