2021-06-03 00:44:37

by Andi Kleen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/8] virtio: Harden split buffer detachment

Harden the split buffer detachment path by adding boundary checking. Note
that when this fails we may fail to unmap some swiotlb mapping, which could
result in a leak and a DOS. But that's acceptable because an malicious host
can DOS us anyways.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index d37ff5a0ff58..1e9aa1e95e1b 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -651,12 +651,19 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
return needs_kick;
}

-static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
- void **ctx)
+static int detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
+ void **ctx)
{
unsigned int i, j;
__virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);

+ /* We'll leak DMA mappings when this happens, but nothing
+ * can be done about that. In the worst case the host
+ * could DOS us, but it can of course do that anyways.
+ */
+ if (!inside_split_ring(vq, head))
+ return -EIO;
+
/* Clear data ptr. */
vq->split.desc_state[head].data = NULL;

@@ -666,6 +673,8 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &vq->split.vring.desc[i]);
i = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, vq->split.vring.desc[i].next);
+ if (!inside_split_ring(vq, i))
+ return -EIO;
vq->vq.num_free++;
}

@@ -684,7 +693,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,

/* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
if (!indir_desc)
- return;
+ return 0;

len = virtio32_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev,
vq->split.vring.desc[head].len);
@@ -701,6 +710,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
} else if (ctx) {
*ctx = vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
}
+ return 0;
}

static inline bool more_used_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
@@ -717,6 +727,7 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
void *ret;
unsigned int i;
u16 last_used;
+ int err;

START_USE(vq);

@@ -751,7 +762,12 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,

/* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
ret = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
- detach_buf_split(vq, i, ctx);
+ err = detach_buf_split(vq, i, ctx);
+ if (err) {
+ END_USE(vq);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
vq->last_used_idx++;
/* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host
* by writing event index and flush out the write before
@@ -863,6 +879,7 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
/* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
buf = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
detach_buf_split(vq, i, NULL);
+ /* Don't need to check for error because nothing is returned */
vq->split.avail_idx_shadow--;
vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
vq->split.avail_idx_shadow);
--
2.25.4


2021-06-03 02:31:23

by Jason Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] virtio: Harden split buffer detachment


在 2021/6/3 上午8:41, Andi Kleen 写道:
> Harden the split buffer detachment path by adding boundary checking. Note
> that when this fails we may fail to unmap some swiotlb mapping, which could
> result in a leak and a DOS. But that's acceptable because an malicious host
> can DOS us anyways.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index d37ff5a0ff58..1e9aa1e95e1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -651,12 +651,19 @@ static bool virtqueue_kick_prepare_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> return needs_kick;
> }
>
> -static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> - void **ctx)
> +static int detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> + void **ctx)
> {
> unsigned int i, j;
> __virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
>
> + /* We'll leak DMA mappings when this happens, but nothing
> + * can be done about that. In the worst case the host
> + * could DOS us, but it can of course do that anyways.
> + */
> + if (!inside_split_ring(vq, head))
> + return -EIO;


I think the caller have already did this for us with even more check on
the token (virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split()):

        if (unlikely(i >= vq->split.vring.num)) {
                BAD_RING(vq, "id %u out of range\n", i);
                return NULL;
        }
        if (unlikely(!vq->split.desc_state[i].data)) {
                BAD_RING(vq, "id %u is not a head!\n", i);
                return NULL;
        }


> +
> /* Clear data ptr. */
> vq->split.desc_state[head].data = NULL;
>
> @@ -666,6 +673,8 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
> vring_unmap_one_split(vq, &vq->split.vring.desc[i]);
> i = virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, vq->split.vring.desc[i].next);
> + if (!inside_split_ring(vq, i))
> + return -EIO;


Similarly, if we don't depend on the metadata stored in the descriptor,
we don't need this check.


> vq->vq.num_free++;
> }
>
> @@ -684,7 +693,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
>
> /* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> if (!indir_desc)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> len = virtio32_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev,
> vq->split.vring.desc[head].len);
> @@ -701,6 +710,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
> } else if (ctx) {
> *ctx = vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc;
> }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static inline bool more_used_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq)
> @@ -717,6 +727,7 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
> void *ret;
> unsigned int i;
> u16 last_used;
> + int err;
>
> START_USE(vq);
>
> @@ -751,7 +762,12 @@ static void *virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>
> /* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
> ret = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
> - detach_buf_split(vq, i, ctx);
> + err = detach_buf_split(vq, i, ctx);
> + if (err) {
> + END_USE(vq);


This reminds me that we don't use END_USE() after BAD_RING() which
should be fixed.

Thanks


> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> vq->last_used_idx++;
> /* If we expect an interrupt for the next entry, tell host
> * by writing event index and flush out the write before
> @@ -863,6 +879,7 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> /* detach_buf_split clears data, so grab it now. */
> buf = vq->split.desc_state[i].data;
> detach_buf_split(vq, i, NULL);
> + /* Don't need to check for error because nothing is returned */
> vq->split.avail_idx_shadow--;
> vq->split.vring.avail->idx = cpu_to_virtio16(_vq->vdev,
> vq->split.avail_idx_shadow);