As the nd_dax_alloc may return NULL pointer,
it should be better to add check for the return
value, as same as the one in nd_dax_create().
Fixes: c5ed9268643c ("libnvdimm, dax: autodetect support")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
index 7f4a9d28b670..9efe62b95dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
@@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ int nd_dax_probe(struct device *dev, struct nd_namespace_common *ndns)
nvdimm_bus_lock(&ndns->dev);
nd_dax = nd_dax_alloc(nd_region);
+ if (!nd_dax)
+ return -ENOMEM;
nd_pfn = &nd_dax->nd_pfn;
dax_dev = nd_pfn_devinit(nd_pfn, ndns);
nvdimm_bus_unlock(&ndns->dev);
--
2.25.1
Le 22/11/2022 à 03:33, Jiasheng Jiang a écrit :
> As the nd_dax_alloc may return NULL pointer,
> it should be better to add check for the return
> value, as same as the one in nd_dax_create().
>
> Fixes: c5ed9268643c ("libnvdimm, dax: autodetect support")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
> index 7f4a9d28b670..9efe62b95dd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ int nd_dax_probe(struct device *dev, struct nd_namespace_common *ndns)
>
> nvdimm_bus_lock(&ndns->dev);
> nd_dax = nd_dax_alloc(nd_region);
> + if (!nd_dax)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> nd_pfn = &nd_dax->nd_pfn;
> dax_dev = nd_pfn_devinit(nd_pfn, ndns);
> nvdimm_bus_unlock(&ndns->dev);
Hi,
Based on 6.1-rc6 ([1]), the error handling is already in place just
after the nvdimm_bus_unlock() call.
CJ
[1]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc6/source/drivers/nvdimm/dax_devs.c#L112