Several threads that suggest this message is related to poor NCQ
support, but I did not see any for this drive. It's a Western Digital
WD1500ADFD-00NLR1. Is this the same thing, and should this drive be
blacklisted?
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x1f1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x1f1 FIS=004040a1:00000008
ata1.00: cmd 61/10:00:90:d3:e8/00:00:0a:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 8192 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: cmd 61/40:20:8e:2e:b8/00:00:06:00:00/40 tag 4 cdb 0x0 data 32768 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: cmd 61/40:28:ce:2e:b8/00:00:06:00:00/40 tag 5 cdb 0x0 data 32768 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: cmd 61/40:30:0e:2f:b8/00:00:06:00:00/40 tag 6 cdb 0x0 data 32768 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: cmd 61/40:38:4e:2f:b8/00:00:06:00:00/40 tag 7 cdb 0x0 data 32768 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1.00: cmd 61/40:40:8e:2f:b8/00:00:06:00:00/40 tag 8 cdb 0x0 data 32768 out
res 40/00:08:80:fc:34/00:00:04:00:00/40 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
ata1: soft resetting port
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1: EH complete
I've attached hdparm -I output.
Thanks,
Jeff Garrett
Jeff Garrett wrote:
> Several threads that suggest this message is related to poor NCQ
> support, but I did not see any for this drive. It's a Western Digital
> WD1500ADFD-00NLR1. Is this the same thing, and should this drive be
> blacklisted?
How reproducible is the problem?
--
tejun