2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops
messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
Of the three, only the first one decodes to anything useful:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c86bd1e0
printing eip:
c4890060
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80]
EFLAGS: 00010a82
eax: c4890050 ebx: c3fcb400 ecx: c489101c edx: ffffffff
esi: c4891160 edi: c4891160 ebp: c48912d4 esp: c36fbee8
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process modprobe (pid: 201, stackpage=c36fb000)
Stack: c01b74fc c3fcb400 c489101c c3fcb400 00000000 c01b7554 c4891160 c3fcb400
c4890000 c489098c 00000001 c4890996 c4891160 c0117d2d c36fa000 08065490
08061760 bfffe164 00000001 c488d000 c488d000 c36fbf60 0000004c c48912c0
Call Trace: [pci_announce_device+44/64] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-8164/80] [pci_register_driver+68/92] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12288/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9844/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9834/80]
[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [sys_init_module+1409/1568] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7488/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] [system_call+51/64]
Code: 12 89 c4 c1 e2 03 89 44 24 18 89 54 24 1c 40 8b 8a c8 0f 89
The addresses are different, but the stack trace is identical,
between test-11(pre1) and test11(final).
I think the oops's each correspond to a modprobe.
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST),
[email protected] (Steven S. Dick) wrote:
>2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
>I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops
>messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
Keith Owens writes:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST),
> [email protected] (Steven S. Dick) wrote:
> >2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
> >I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops
> >messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
>
> Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
--- orig/kernel/module.c Wed Nov 22 14:08:23 2000
+++ linux/kernel/module.c Sat Nov 25 10:40:26 2000
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@
/* Ok, that's about all the sanity we can stomach; copy the rest. */
- if (copy_from_user(mod+1, mod_user+1, mod->size-sizeof(*mod))) {
+ if (copy_from_user((char *)mod+mod_user_size,
+ (char *)mod_user+mod_user_size,
+ mod->size-mod_user_size)) {
error = -EFAULT;
goto err3;
}
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King [email protected] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 12:27:24 +0000 (GMT),
Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
>Keith Owens writes:
>> On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST),
>> [email protected] (Steven S. Dick) wrote:
>> >2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
>> >I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops
>> >messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
>>
>> Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
>
>Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
Upgrading to modutils 2.3.21 is easier and everybody should do that
anyway to fix the local root exploits.
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:27:24PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> Keith Owens writes:
> Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
How about we apply both that patch and this one?
diff -u linux/Documentation/Changes.old linux/Documentation/Changes
--- linux/Documentation/Changes.old Sat Nov 25 11:18:00 2000
+++ linux/Documentation/Changes Sat Nov 25 11:18:28 2000
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version
o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v
o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v
-o modutils 2.3.18 # insmod -V
+o modutils 2.3.21 # insmod -V
o e2fsprogs 1.19 # tune2fs --version
o pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V
o PPP 2.4.0 # pppd --version
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:21:16 -0500,
"Steven S. Dick" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:27:24PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
>> Keith Owens writes:
>> Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
>
>How about we apply both that patch and this one?
Both already sent to Linus and Alan Cox.