2021-11-03 08:57:01

by tjiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: using big-endian definition for board_id in struct qca_version

As we name nvm file by using big-endian for boardID, so align host with
it.

Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 46d892bbde62..08a1c6d8390f 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ struct qca_version {
__le32 rom_version;
__le32 patch_version;
__le32 ram_version;
- __le16 board_id;
+ __be16 board_id;
__le16 flag;
__u8 reserved[4];
} __packed;
@@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char
*fwname, size_t max_size,
u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);

if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
- u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
+ u16 board_id = be16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
const char *variant;

switch (le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version)) {
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


2021-11-03 14:26:25

by Marcel Holtmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: using big-endian definition for board_id in struct qca_version

Hi Tim,

> As we name nvm file by using big-endian for boardID, so align host with it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index 46d892bbde62..08a1c6d8390f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ struct qca_version {
> __le32 rom_version;
> __le32 patch_version;
> __le32 ram_version;
> - __le16 board_id;
> + __be16 board_id;
> __le16 flag;
> __u8 reserved[4];
> } __packed;
> @@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname, size_t max_size,
> u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
>
> if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
> - u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
> + u16 board_id = be16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
> const char *variant;

my original comment still stands. Are you sure you are doing this correctly. The in-memory layout of your NVM is mixed little-endian and big-endian? Really? Or do you want to convert back from host endian to big endian?

You commit message text suggest that you have to do this:

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
index 46d892bbde62..55a33a5fea56 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
@@ -3090,7 +3090,7 @@ static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname, size_t max_size,
rom_version, variant);
} else {
snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
- rom_version, variant, board_id);
+ rom_version, variant, cpu_to_be16(board_id));
}
} else {
snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin”,

And really, I can not do this anymore. Write lengthy commit messages explaining your change in detail. I am not looking a patches anymore until they have a proper paragraph explaining the change and why it is correct.

Also this change had v16 before I merged and even in that version I had to fix issues. Please stop wasting my time. I have no idea why this wasn’t caught earlier. It is a fundamental flaw. I am close to just reverting the previous patch since it seems it clearly needs more testing.

Regards

Marcel

2021-11-04 07:02:14

by tjiang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Bluetooth: btusb: using big-endian definition for board_id in struct qca_version

Hi Marcel:
yeah , you are right, but in fact we mixing little-endian and
big-endian is defined by qc btsoc(have some reason), so host only should
be align with it , I will make another change , need your help to
review, thank you.

regards.
tim


On 2021-11-03 22:24, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>> As we name nvm file by using big-endian for boardID, so align host
>> with it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 46d892bbde62..08a1c6d8390f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ struct qca_version {
>> __le32 rom_version;
>> __le32 patch_version;
>> __le32 ram_version;
>> - __le16 board_id;
>> + __be16 board_id;
>> __le16 flag;
>> __u8 reserved[4];
>> } __packed;
>> @@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char
>> *fwname, size_t max_size,
>> u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
>>
>> if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> - u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
>> + u16 board_id = be16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
>> const char *variant;
>
> my original comment still stands. Are you sure you are doing this
> correctly. The in-memory layout of your NVM is mixed little-endian and
> big-endian? Really? Or do you want to convert back from host endian to
> big endian?
>
> You commit message text suggest that you have to do this:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index 46d892bbde62..55a33a5fea56 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -3090,7 +3090,7 @@ static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char
> *fwname, size_t max_size,
> rom_version, variant);
> } else {
> snprintf(fwname, max_size,
> "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
> - rom_version, variant, board_id);
> + rom_version, variant,
> cpu_to_be16(board_id));
> }
> } else {
> snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin”,
>
> And really, I can not do this anymore. Write lengthy commit messages
> explaining your change in detail. I am not looking a patches anymore
> until they have a proper paragraph explaining the change and why it is
> correct.
>
> Also this change had v16 before I merged and even in that version I
> had to fix issues. Please stop wasting my time. I have no idea why
> this wasn’t caught earlier. It is a fundamental flaw. I am close to
> just reverting the previous patch since it seems it clearly needs more
> testing.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel