Thanks Matthias for the comments. please see my comments inline .
BTW: marcel , do you agree with Matthias comments ? if fine , I will
align Matthias comments and make the final version.
regards.
tim
On 2021-10-20 03:29, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:55:56PM +0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> the RF performance of wcn6855 soc chip from different foundries will
>> be
>> difference, so we should use different nvm to configure them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tim Jiang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 56
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 75c83768c257..f352ff351b61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -3190,6 +3190,9 @@ static int btusb_set_bdaddr_wcn6855(struct
>> hci_dev
>> *hdev,
>> #define QCA_DFU_TIMEOUT 3000
>> #define QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM 0x80
>>
>> +#define WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1200
>> +#define WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF 0x400c1211
>> +
>> struct qca_version {
>> __le32 rom_version;
>> __le32 patch_version;
>> @@ -3221,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct qca_device_info
>> qca_devices_table[] = {
>> { 0x00000302, 28, 4, 16 }, /* Rome 3.2 */
>> { 0x00130100, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 1.0 */
>> { 0x00130200, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.0 */
>> + { 0x00130201, 40, 4, 16 }, /* WCN6855 2.1 */
>> };
>>
>> static int btusb_qca_send_vendor_req(struct usb_device *udev, u8
>> request,
>> @@ -3375,6 +3379,43 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_rampatch(struct
>> hci_dev *hdev,
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static void btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(char *fwname,
>> + size_t max_size,
>> + struct qca_version *ver)
>
> => const struct qca_version *ver
>
>> +{
>> + u32 rom_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version);
>> + u16 flag = le16_to_cpu(ver->flag);
>> +
>> + if (((flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> + u16 board_id = le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id);
>> + u32 ram_version = le32_to_cpu(ver->ram_version);
>> + const char *variant;
>> +
>> + switch (ram_version) {
>> + case WCN6855_2_0_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> + case WCN6855_2_1_RAM_VERSION_GF:
>> + variant = "_gf";
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + variant = "";
>
> instead of the default branch you could assign a default to 'variant'
> at
> declaration time, but it's fine either way.
[Tim] this code style is recommend by marcel.
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without suffix */
>
> delete the comment, it just states the obvious
>
>> + if (board_id == 0x0) {
>
> nit: is there really any value in using a hex number here instead of a
> plain decimal 0?
[Tim] this line is inherit from last change , if you think I should
change 0x0 to 0 , I am fine.
>
>> + snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s.bin",
>> + rom_version, variant);
>> + } else {
>> + snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x%s_%04x.bin",
>> + rom_version, variant, board_id);
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + snprintf(fwname, max_size, "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> + rom_version);
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>> struct qca_version *ver,
>> const struct qca_device_info *info)
>> @@ -3383,20 +3424,7 @@ static int btusb_setup_qca_load_nvm(struct
>> hci_dev
>> *hdev,
>> char fwname[64];
>> int err;
>>
>> - if (((ver->flag >> 8) & 0xff) == QCA_FLAG_MULTI_NVM) {
>> - /* if boardid equal 0, use default nvm without surfix */
>> - if (le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id) == 0x0) {
>> - snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> - le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
>> - } else {
>> - snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x_%04x.bin",
>> - le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version),
>> - le16_to_cpu(ver->board_id));
>> - }
>> - } else {
>> - snprintf(fwname, sizeof(fwname), "qca/nvm_usb_%08x.bin",
>> - le32_to_cpu(ver->rom_version));
>> - }
>> + btusb_generate_qca_nvm_name(fwname, sizeof(fwname), ver);
>>
>> err = request_firmware(&fw, fwname, &hdev->dev);
>> if (err) {