This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=518815
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch FAIL 0.90 seconds
GitLint PASS 0.24 seconds
BuildKernel PASS 598.23 seconds
TestRunner: Setup PASS 394.48 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester PASS 2.88 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester PASS 2.10 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester PASS 31.86 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester PASS 2.40 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester PASS 2.25 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester FAIL 2.28 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester PASS 2.14 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 0.90 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
Bluetooth: fix inconsistent lock state in rfcomm_connect_ind
WARNING: Unknown commit id 'fad003b6c8e3d', maybe rebased or not pulled?
#6:
Commit fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with
WARNING: Unknown commit id 'e6da0edc24ee', maybe rebased or not pulled?
#12:
Later, this was changed in commit e6da0edc24ee ("Bluetooth: Acquire
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
"[PATCH] Bluetooth: fix inconsistent lock state in rfcomm_connect_ind" has style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
##############################
Test: GitLint - PASS - 0.24 seconds
Run gitlint with rule in .gitlint
##############################
Test: BuildKernel - PASS - 598.23 seconds
Build Kernel with minimal configuration supports Bluetooth
##############################
Test: TestRunner: Setup - PASS - 394.48 seconds
Setup environment for running Test Runner
##############################
Test: TestRunner: l2cap-tester - PASS - 2.88 seconds
Run test-runner with l2cap-tester
Total: 40, Passed: 40 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner: bnep-tester - PASS - 2.10 seconds
Run test-runner with bnep-tester
Total: 1, Passed: 1 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner: mgmt-tester - PASS - 31.86 seconds
Run test-runner with mgmt-tester
Total: 448, Passed: 445 (99.3%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 3
##############################
Test: TestRunner: rfcomm-tester - PASS - 2.40 seconds
Run test-runner with rfcomm-tester
Total: 9, Passed: 9 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner: sco-tester - PASS - 2.25 seconds
Run test-runner with sco-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 8 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
##############################
Test: TestRunner: smp-tester - FAIL - 2.28 seconds
Run test-runner with smp-tester
Total: 8, Passed: 7 (87.5%), Failed: 1, Not Run: 0
Failed Test Cases
SMP Client - SC Request 2 Failed 0.022 seconds
##############################
Test: TestRunner: userchan-tester - PASS - 2.14 seconds
Run test-runner with userchan-tester
Total: 3, Passed: 3 (100.0%), Failed: 0, Not Run: 0
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth