Return-Path: Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <9925799E-5F50-4C03-9C0C-A28A9A657B1A@holtmann.org> From: Marcel Holtmann To: Oliver Neukum In-Reply-To: <200808041901.36706.oliver@neukum.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 19:25:17 +0200 References: <200807311452.24166.oliver@neukum.org> <200808041823.28309.oliver@neukum.org> <7D2DA686-9741-4369-9E47-E4AD140D067E@holtmann.org> <200808041901.36706.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Oliver, >>> Then why do you implement this option for hci_usb? >>> And why can the other IGNORE options be overridden? >> >> if I wanna use the generic Bluetooth descriptor for matching, I >> need a >> way to mark broken devices as to be ignored. Otherwise I would have a >> really long list of matching vendor and product ids. > > True, but if btusb is to replace hci_usb, the module options should > match. > So will you remove that option in hci_usb? the override_ignore is your invention. So what do you mean? Regards Marcel