Return-Path: From: Oliver Neukum To: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [rfc]btusb with SCO support Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 10:33:04 +0200 Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org References: <200807311452.24166.oliver@neukum.org> <200808011357.16868.oliver@neukum.org> <1217612718.7819.7.camel@californication> In-Reply-To: <1217612718.7819.7.camel@californication> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200808041033.05446.oliver@neukum.org> List-ID: Am Freitag 01 August 2008 19:45:18 schrieb Marcel Holtmann: > Hi Oliver, > > > > Both table updates should be a separate patch and we can even submit > > > that for 2.6.27 inclusion. I was just to lazy to do that, but I have > > > it on my todo list, but the Simple Pairing support had higher priority. > > > > This patch implements the quirks from hci_usb in btusb, too. > > > > --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c 2008-08-01 10:53:38.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6.26/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c 2008-08-01 13:47:54.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -41,21 +41,108 @@ > > #define BT_DBG(D...) > > #endif > > > > -#define VERSION "0.1" > > +#define VERSION "0.3" > > the version number increase to 0.3 is bogus, it should be 0.2. Roger. > > +module_param(override_ignore, bool, 0644); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(override_ignore, "Drive blacklisted devices"); > > Why do we need this one? What is it good for? To override HCI_IGNORE. IF we provide overrides for blacklist entries, it should be done systematically. Regards Oliver