Return-Path: Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 02:08:34 -0300 From: =?utf-8?Q?Rog=C3=A9rio?= Brito To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Help getting bluetooth disabled Message-ID: <20081008050833.GA15051@ime.usp.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear developers, I got this past july a notebook that has what seems to be a strange way of dealing with wireless devices: there is a button (which I suspect is called rfkill) that, when pressed, enables *both* bluetooth and wifi, with the respective leds being lit. I don't have any bluetooth device. Saving energy here is paramount as the battery life is quite short. According to the manual, under Windows Vista (which is what came with the box, but which I never used), this button is supposed to cycle between 4 states: * both disabled; * bluetooth enabled & wifi enabled; * bluetooth disabled & wifi enabled; * bluetooth enabled & wifi disabled. Unfortunately, under Linux (tested with Ubuntu's 8.10 pre-releases, which includes a kernel based on 2.6.27-rc*, if I understand it correctly), it is all or nothing: both disabled or both enabled. If I launch powertop, it recommends to disable bluetooth with "hciconfig hci down; rmmod hci_usb", but the led of bluetooth is still lit and I fear that the device is still drawing power from the battery. Is there any way to get it to disable completely the device? Just as extra information, this is an Itautec Note N8320 notebook, with a Core 2 Duo T7250 CPU, ICH8 chipset and Intel's 3945abg wifi and a Realtek GigE driven by r8169 module (which I still have not had the opportunity to use). If any further information is desired, please let me know. I can post the dmesg logs, lspci output, lsusb, as I am really willing to get this situation settled (and possibly working as on Windows as it was reported by the support people from the manufacturer). Again, if any further information is needed, please let me know. Thanks, Rog=C3=A9rio Brito. P.S.: Please, I would kindly ask to be included in Cc'ies, as I am not subscribed to the list. --=20 Rog=C3=A9rio Brito : rbrito@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFI7EBRCFqbMnwsrrgRAkvaAKDESTtkcFg4Ba7xWMhdZQrWrW2geACfW9qX NspkfcUy0L54LHzKoBw3JWg= =/bHo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr--