Return-Path: Subject: RE: To enablue DID in coming bluez release From: Marcel Holtmann To: "Li, Zhigang" Cc: Johan Hedberg , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , "Zhao, Forrest" In-Reply-To: References: <1229046931.22285.30.camel@violet.holtmann.net> <20081216102928.GA12914@localhost> <1229481492.10889.1.camel@violet> <1229543953.10889.16.camel@violet> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:01:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1229713295.879.12.camel@californication> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Zhigang, please stop top-posting. This is an open source mailing list and we do bottom posting and inline quoting. > If USB Vendor ID and Bluetooth Vendor ID are both exist which one you prefer in DID? We can't add both right? Default is Bluetooth since we are doing Bluetooth here and not USB. USB would need a specific prefix. So I prefer usb:1223:1233:1223 for indicating USB ids and without we default to Bluetooth. Care to send a patch for it. Regards Marcel