Return-Path: Message-ID: From: "David Stockwell" To: "Marcel Holtmann" Cc: References: <6F8E4829F275487887832A64E4125229@freqonedev> <1231210590.13304.21.camel@californication> Subject: Re: FYI, regarding AVRCP Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:39:24 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original List-ID: Hi Marcel...got your previous responses, thanks. Believe it or not, this list works pretty well. Regards... > Hi David, > > so lets try this again since it seems vger eat my last reply :( > >> Since our meeting in PortlandI have been busy dealing with both "day >> job" issues, as well as finishing up some Intellectual Property >> issues >> surrounding my ongoing evening/weekend project, of which AVRCP and my >> remote are a small but critical part. Within the next two weeks I >> will >> reengage AVRCP and expect to soon bring it up to 1.3 (metadata >> transfer) >> as we discussed in Portland. Sorry it has taken so long. > > great, because I was going to ping you about that part :) > >> With regard to the question from Park Chan-Yeol, I suggest we >> consider a >> Bluez/DBUS "version" property (for simplicity, a String) for the >> org.bluez.Control interface, to allow users to know just what they >> are >> dealing with. Any thoughts? > > Yeah. Looks good to me. > > Regards > > Marcel > >