Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] *** SUBJECT HERE *** From: Marcel Holtmann To: ngh@isomerica.net Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Holstein In-Reply-To: <1241055744-12140-1-git-send-email-ngh@isomerica.net> References: <1241055744-12140-1-git-send-email-ngh@isomerica.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:01:28 -0700 Message-Id: <1241056888.3389.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Nathan, > This is a revamping of the previous patches that I submited. I started from > scratch, rebase all the changes onto the latest bluetooth-testing (2.6.30-rc3). > While applying the changes, I attempted to clean up the code and apply the > input from Marcel and Gustavo. > > Unfortunately, I did not get a chance to test this for regressions vs. the > previous version of the code. I did remove the code which segmented outgoing > PDUs: it wouldn't have worked with the current tx window=1, and would have > produced memory leaks. > > The code is available from git://staticfree.info/git/el2cap on branch "ertm". no idea why are using a branch for this. Just a remote repository should be enough. Anyhow you have to add Signed-off-by statements to your patches. Otherwise I can't apply them. Regards Marcel