Return-Path: Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:36:02 +0300 From: Johan Hedberg To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Paulo Rechi Vita , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for the source interface to audio IPC. Message-ID: <20090816173529.GA9132@jh-x301> References: <1250390653-476-1-git-send-email-jprvita@gmail.com> <20090816143858.GA4896@jh-x301> <2d5a2c100908160938w55475cabm7a23c34258f7de9e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <2d5a2c100908160938w55475cabm7a23c34258f7de9e@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Luiz, On Sun, Aug 16, 2009, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009, Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: > >> ? ? ? if (!interface) { > >> - ? ? ? ? ? ? if (dev->sink && avdtp_is_connected(&dev->src, &dev->dst)) > >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (dev->source && avdtp_is_connected(&dev->src, &dev->dst)) > >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return TYPE_SOURCE; > >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? else if (dev->sink && avdtp_is_connected(&dev->src, &dev->dst)) > >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return TYPE_SINK; > > > > I think the dev->source check should be in an "else if" clause while the > > dev->sink check should be first. I.e. if a device happens to support both > > roles of A2DP we default to dev->sink. > > Good catches, perhaps we should consider doing avdtp_is_connected > check before checking for sink/source pointers. What do you think? What exactly do you mean? Could you perhaps give an example code snippet of how you'd like the code to look like? Johan