Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35c90d960907151511u3a49f1d3obea010371a031cd2@mail.gmail.com> References: <35c90d960905191820g4e3ee434hfd0060815540a4e0@mail.gmail.com> <1242787757.3147.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <35c90d960905201457i508c678fqeb696cce32ae63be@mail.gmail.com> <35c90d960907061155t7349cc90p2e58a09a310b8926@mail.gmail.com> <35c90d960907091237o72228b0v57ad2556d77f4857@mail.gmail.com> <35c90d960907130846v2320de88pd6f34b8aabfdbb9e@mail.gmail.com> <2d5a2c100907131427x18f26f82g405a781cd8670b88@mail.gmail.com> <35c90d960907140915u71f20473x83b25579c4117a2d@mail.gmail.com> <35c90d960907151511u3a49f1d3obea010371a031cd2@mail.gmail.com> From: Nick Pelly Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: <35c90d960908061103q4cba696dr89d21e4a14a9470c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: bug? kernel does not send HCI Create Connection Cancel Command on shutdown() or close() of a connecting rfcomm socket To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Cc: Marcel Holtmann , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-ID: On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Nick Pelly wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Nick Pelly wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Luiz Augusto von >> Dentz wrote: >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Nick Pelly wrote: >>>> Any comments on this patch? >>>> >>>> It works for me, but my understanding of the RFCOMM state machine is naive. >>>> >>> >>> iirc BT_CONFIG(PN frame) means the DLC is being configured than we got >>> into connecting phase (BT_CONNECT) and send SABM frame. Only when >>> receiving UA frame DLC is consider connected (BT_CONNECTED), so your >>> patch seems good by assuming that we don't need to send a DISC for a >>> DLC not connected. But there is still a good use for it to cancel the >>> DLC connection attempt, so perhaps a better alternative would be to >>> use a much shorter timeout in those cases. >> >> Thanks for the advice. >> >> I have prepared a new patch which uses a very short timeout (10ms) on >> the DLC disconnect when in BT_CONFIG. I have tested this patch and it >> also resolves the issue. Patch attached. > > ping > > I will be offline for 2 weeks from tomorrow, so if there is further > testing or patches you would like me to try then I won't be able to > help after tomorrow. ping. Looking for 'yes this is ok, patch merged' or 'no this is not ok, because....' Nick