Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] bluetooth: hidp+hidraw write support From: Marcel Holtmann To: SephirXV Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <21b895620909101040qeb5973axbba6c5a44f6e5b6a@mail.gmail.com> References: <21b895620909101040qeb5973axbba6c5a44f6e5b6a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:50:26 +0200 Message-Id: <1252605026.8931.46.camel@violet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Christopher, > somewhere before .28, non-compliant HIDP devices would connect, and > could be read from, but writing to the device had no effect. this is not a proper commit message. Don't care about "somewhere", just explain what this patch is fixing or what feature it adds. > Signed-off-by: Christopher Olson > > --- > > --- net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c 2009-09-10 09:32:20.000000000 -0500 > +++ net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c.2 2009-09-10 09:41:37.000000000 -0500 > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -513,6 +514,11 @@ static void hidp_process_transmit(struct > kfree_skb(skb); > } > } > + > +static int hidp_output_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, __u8 *buf, > size_t count) > +{ > + return hidp_send_ctrl_message(hid->driver_data, buf[0], buf + > 1, count - 1); > +} Please just create the SKB, copy the data, queue it and schedule it. This buf[0] and buf + 1. Is pointless and just confusing. And while at it change the send_ctrl_message to only accept the header parameter since we are not even using data and size at all. Regards Marcel