Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:58:28 -0500
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@bombadil.infradead.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	holtmann@linux.intel.com, lrodriguez@atheros.com
Subject: Re: ath3k for 2.6.33-rc6
Message-ID: <20100128215828.GE8069@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <43e72e891001221652s1ead6966r808c72d5b4bdf340@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891001221652s1ead6966r808c72d5b4bdf340@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@infradead.org>
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:52:29PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Hey Marcel,
> 
> sorry about the confusion the other day about overstepping you for a
> push for ath3k into 2.6.33, I'd like to clarify that was not my
> intention, I made the incorrect assumption you received my ping but
> didn't care to push it. I wanted to see what you think its OK to push
> ath3k into the next cycle for the 2.6.33-rc6 release.
> 
> Thanks,

Marcel, was wondering if you have given this some thought. Thanks,

  Luis