Return-Path: Message-ID: <4BC19B11.1090409@xyzw.org> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:49:05 -0700 From: Brian Rogers MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Mouse authentication regression after 4.63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Upon trying out a newer version of BlueZ, I found a regression in support for my mouse caused by the following commit: commit aee26b30bbc24cde464ba1a557c2b258ddec6432 Author: Johan Hedberg Date: Tue Mar 30 13:36:46 2010 +0300 Make BtIO default security level MEDIUM MEDIUM makes more sense than the kernel default LOW which maps to "no bonding" with SSP (something that's useful only for very special cases such as OPP). After this commit, when I turn on or move my mouse, I get prompted for a PIN to use for the connection. "0000" won't work, and blank isn't accepted, so the mouse can't connect. Deleting and re-pairing my mouse doesn't work either. I suspect my mouse just does not support encryption. I've never seen AUTH or ENCRYPT on my mouse in the output of "hcitool con" and I can't enable encryption on a working bluez using "hcitool auth". It just prompts for a PIN, and disconnects the mouse when I enter one. And there's no documentation on what PIN should be used with this mouse. With the above commit reverted, it works fine again. The mouse information is below. Could this be a device-specific quirk? What information is needed to resolve this? $ hcitool info 00:12:A1:63:EF:3A Requesting information ... BD Address: 00:12:A1:63:EF:3A Device Name: Interlink Bluetooth Mouse LMP Version: 2.0 (0x3) LMP Subversion: 0x229 Manufacturer: Broadcom Corporation (15) Features: 0xbc 0x02 0x04 0x38 0x08 0x00 0x00 0x00