Return-Path: Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:22:14 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lukasz.Rymanowski@tieto.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add UART support for the ST-Ericsson CG2900. Message-ID: <20101029172214.25b14c2a@pyx> In-Reply-To: References: <20101022135130.617f0ce8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <201010281422.46687.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Shouldn't you instead be using the drivers/bluetooth/hci_{ldisc,h4} code? > > We also need the ldisc code to handle events from FM and GPS and since > that is chip specific we cannot add that to the generic hci_ldisc > code. Agreed - it's a different protocol. > I agree that we might run into problems if two drivers try to register > the same line discipline. It might then be better to introduce a new If your ldisc is written properly it shouldn't matter. Each tty has a private ldisc pointer to keep the per ldisc instance data. > line discipline then even though that could cause other problems. I do > not know if it is possible to add a condition in Kconfig otherwise so > the CG2900 ldisc cannot be active while the "normal" ldisc driver is > selected. Not sure I follow the concern here ?