Return-Path: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:07:52 -0300 From: Vinicius Costa Gomes To: Inga Stotland Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GATT and D-Bus Message-ID: <20110129000752.GA23931@piper> References: <001c01cb931d$dc4cb3a0$94e61ae0$@org> <20101203220534.GA16709@eris> <1295895817.2656.26.camel@ubuntuLab1> <20110124213429.GA15121@piper> <000101cbbf41$cc0cee10$6426ca30$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <000101cbbf41$cc0cee10$6426ca30$@org> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Inga, On 15:19 Fri 28 Jan, Inga Stotland wrote: > Hi Vinicus, > > Not sure who to ask, but it seems that you are the active contributor to the > part of the code that I am interested in :) > I am looking at using D-Bus to talk to GATT just over BR/EDR. The support > for that seems to be partially there ( I am working off the current bluez > tip). However, in the current code it does not seem possible to get GATT > over D-Bus working if the device is not LE. Am I missing something here? > Also, I can see that you were sending GATT patches upstream: "[PATCH 00/18] > Making GATT a first class citizen", not all of them have been pushed > through. Are you planning on re-submitting the changes? Those patches are already upstream, it was just that the "applied" message came via IRC. What is missing for the BR/EDR case is that we need to trigger GATT Service Discovery after the SDP Browse, if the Device has the GATT Service Record. SMP is still taking a lot of my time, that I didn't have the time to go back and solve this issue, but it is still on the top of my todo list ;-) > > Thank you, > > Inga Stotland > > ingas@codeaurora.org > Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum > > > > Cheers, -- Vinicius