Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1299270913-8436-2-git-send-email-andre.guedes@openbossa.org> References: <1299270913-8436-1-git-send-email-andre.guedes@openbossa.org> <1299270913-8436-2-git-send-email-andre.guedes@openbossa.org> From: Anderson Briglia Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:58:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] Bluetooth: Implement advertising report meta event To: Andre Guedes Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Andre Guedes wrote: > From: Anderson Briglia > > This patch implements new LE meta event in order to handle advertising > reports. > > Signed-off-by: Anderson Briglia > --- > ?include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | ? 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > ?net/bluetooth/hci_event.c ? | ? 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > ?2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > index d851f8b..fdcc494 100644 > --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > @@ -1011,6 +1011,24 @@ struct hci_ev_le_conn_complete { > ? ? ? ?__u8 ? ? clk_accurancy; > ?} __packed; > > +#define ADV_IND ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x00 > +#define ADV_DIRECT_IND 0x01 > +#define ADV_SCAN_IND ? 0x02 > +#define ADV_NONCONN_IND ? ? ? ?0x03 > +#define SCAN_RSP ? ? ? 0x04 > + > +#define ADDR_DEV_PUBLIC ? ? ? ?0x00 > +#define ADDR_DEV_RANDOM ? ? ? ?0x01 > + > +#define HCI_EV_LE_ADVERTISING_REPORT ? 0x02 > +struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info { > + ? ? ? __u8 ? ? evt_type; > + ? ? ? __u8 ? ? bdaddr_type; > + ? ? ? bdaddr_t bdaddr; > + ? ? ? __u8 ? ? length; > + ? ? ? __u8 ? ? data[0]; > +} __packed; > + > ?#define HCI_EV_LE_LTK_REQ ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0x05 > ?struct hci_ev_le_ltk_req { > ? ? ? ?__le16 ?handle; > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > index 5a2ab2c..8acc4a5 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > @@ -2556,6 +2556,24 @@ static inline void hci_le_ltk_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, > ? ? ? ?hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > ?} > > +static inline void hci_le_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + ? ? ? struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *ev; > + ? ? ? u8 num_reports, i; > + > + ? ? ? num_reports = skb->data[0]; > + > + ? ? ? ev = (void *) &skb->data[1]; > + > + ? ? ? BT_DBG("adv from: %s", batostr(&ev->bdaddr)); > + > + ? ? ? for (i = 1; i < num_reports; i++) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ev = (void *) (ev->data + ev->length + 1); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? BT_DBG("adv from: %s", batostr(&ev->bdaddr)); > + ? ? ? } > +} > + > ?static inline void hci_le_meta_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > ?{ > ? ? ? ?struct hci_ev_le_meta *le_ev = (void *) skb->data; > @@ -2571,6 +2589,10 @@ static inline void hci_le_meta_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hci_le_ltk_request_evt(hdev, skb); > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break; > > + ? ? ? case HCI_EV_LE_ADVERTISING_REPORT: > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? hci_le_adv_report_evt(hdev, skb); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; > + > ? ? ? ?default: > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?break; > ? ? ? ?} > -- > 1.7.1 > > Please, do not consider this patch. I have another one with some modifications proposed by padovan. Andre, rebase your git tree, please. -- INdT - Instituto Nokia de tecnologia +55 2126 1122 http://techblog.briglia.net