Return-Path: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <99B09243E1A5DA4898CDD8B70011144810861C42D7@EXMB04.eu.tieto.com> References: <6274c94659d0fd65491ca3370cf69db4.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> <91156ff5702cf87ea80f2285c5c92855.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> <99B09243E1A5DA4898CDD8B70011144810861C42D7@EXMB04.eu.tieto.com> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: About the BT_SECURITY_HIGH support in Bluez stack From: braghave@codeaurora.org To: Waldemar.Rymarkiewicz@tieto.com Cc: braghave@codeaurora.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Thanks for the response. Is there any plan to add this feature to Bluez in near future? at least for bluez 5.x time frame? Thanks, -- Bhaktha Qualcomm India, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum -- > Hi, > >>> I was looking at the archived conversations below, >>> >>> http://marc.info/?t=128290950000001&r=1&w=2 >>> >>> I see, there is some effort in adding this BT_SECURITY_HIGH suuport >>> in to the bluez stack, which is a mandatory for the BT SAP profile. >>> >>> Could you please, let me know what is the plan to release these >>> patches as part of Bluez? >>> >>> These patches seem to be suffecient. But, may need to add another >>> D-Bus property to emit to the UI layers to take 16 character >>PIN code. > > Those patches are obsolete as this part has changed significantly. > Most of this should be supported in kernel and not bluez now. > > Waldek