Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Sender: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <pao@profusion.mobi>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:02:30 -0300
From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>
To: Mika Linnanoja <mika.linnanoja@nokia.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	ext Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com>,
	Antti Julku <antti.julku@nokia.com>,
	ext Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	Lukasz Rymanowski <lukasz.rymanowski@tieto.com>,
	linus.walleij@stericsson.com, par-gunnar.p.hjalmdahl@stericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth: Fix for security block issue.
Message-ID: <20110505190230.GC2098@joana>
References: <1295965639-16683-1-git-send-email-lukasz.rymanowski@tieto.com>
 <1295971990.1520.53.camel@aeonflux>
 <4DB935D9.5080302@nokia.com>
 <20110428095139.GJ18898@null>
 <4DBA6D97.7050207@nokia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <4DBA6D97.7050207@nokia.com>
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Mika,

* Mika Linnanoja <mika.linnanoja@nokia.com> [2011-04-29 10:49:43 +0300]:

> On 04/28/2011 12:51 PM, ext Ville Tervo wrote:
> > Could the actual reason be some change in usb stack? Could it have lower
> > priority for event pipe than for data pipe? In that case event for security
> > change might arrive to bt stack too late.
> >
> > At lest I haven't seen this kind of behaviour with serial attached chips. So I
> > think this is something USB specific.
> 
> Happens on Ubuntu 11.04 (released yesterday; bluez 4.91 & kernel 2.6.38-8) as 
> well, tested with White PTS 2.1 dongle (CSR chip) on laptop x61s. Sending 
> party (OPP with obex-client in a loop) was a phone.

Is this an regression? Or did it never happen before?

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi