Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4dbf1776.0bd9650a.1733.7e99@mx.google.com> <20110504213936.GA22493@jh-x301> <20110505140531.GA27568@piper> From: Anderson Briglia Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 14:51:29 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove btio.c compilation warning To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Cc: Vinicius Costa Gomes , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elvis_Pf=FCtzenreuter?= , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > Hi Vinicius, > > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Vinicius Costa Gomes > wrote: >> Hi Luiz, >> >> On 11:05 Thu 05 May, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> >>> I don't see why it would be ubuntu specific, this seems to be some >>> kind of regression/'feature' with gcc 4.5. >> >> Yeah, I really believe this is the case. I have gcc 4.5.2 here, that >> would be the version as in Natty, and I don't encounter that problem. > > So it seems to be Ubuntu specific in some way, very annoying way. > >> The only difference that I could find is that Ubuntu ships gcc with >> a .diff.gz of 1.3MB ;-) >> >> But back to the topic at hand, I agree that the patch should be applied, >> Ubuntu is used by many developers and BlueZ should be kept clean of >> warnings. > > Well if we don't get anywhere with the bug Elvis sent than that is the > only think we can do, or maybe there is some new gcc flag that can > prevent such behavior. I'll resend the patch and you decide if it is worth to be applied or not. Regards, Briglia > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz > Computer Engineer > -- INdT - Instituto Nokia de tecnologia +55 2126 1122 http://techblog.briglia.net