Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
From: Arun Kumar SINGH <arunkr.singh@stericsson.com>
To: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@profusion.mobi>,
	Anurag Gupta <anurag1303@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 09:26:58 +0200
Subject: RE: BT 3.0 HS Support in BlueZ
Message-ID: <AFCDDB4A3EA003429EEF1E7B211FDBBA3395937A4C@EXDCVYMBSTM005.EQ1STM.local>
References: <BANLkTimKJNo9WgwkfC2Hci-dW6kjF3VWGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110419180425.GA2476@joana>
In-Reply-To: <20110419180425.GA2476@joana>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Gustavo,

>> Does anybody know if
>bluetooth 3.0 HS spec is
>supported in BlueZ?
>> Is AMP supported in BlueZ?
>
>There is two different
>implementations, one by
>Atheros and another by QuIC.
>Both never reach upstream,
>if you look to the list logs
>you will find them.


Any hopes of getting this unified version upstream anytime in near future? I guess this has been on the cards for some time now given that merge process started last august. 

I am trying to understand the options other folks may have, who may be interested in having 3.0 support in Bluez. Rewriting entire 3.0 support from scratch may be one thing that should be avoided as long as current upstreaming activity doesn't end up in a dead trail.  Which I assume, it hadn't. 

 
Thanks,
Arun