Return-Path: Message-ID: <4F0D6EB4.8060409@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:12:52 +0100 From: Harvey Reply-To: harv@gmx.de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Add support for BCM20702A0 [0489:e031] References: <4F0ACADF.1060906@cestona.ro> <1326137984.6454.152.camel@aeonflux> <4F0BE4CB.30907@gmx.de> <1326183061.6454.194.camel@aeonflux> <4F0C355E.5050609@gmx.de> <1326214276.6454.212.camel@aeonflux> <4F0D450F.3000600@gmx.de> <1326278147.6454.225.camel@aeonflux> <4F0D6924.8070105@gmx.de> <1326279411.6454.227.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: <1326279411.6454.227.camel@aeonflux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marcel, >>> so there is clearly some binary download in the capture file. It will >>> most likely match the files that a referenced in the .inf file. However >>> I am not reverse engineering this stuff for anybody. Someone else has to >>> do that job. >> >> So we're at an end here? I simply can't do it, you won't do it - game over? > > most likely. Unless you find someone that does the reverse engineering > for you. I bet it is pretty trivial, but I have no bandwidth for this. Although this is disappointing for me, I understand completely. This is not your job. Broadcom or Fujitsu are coming to my mind :P >> BTW, I get your answers twice, once on the list, once as PM. Is this >> intended? > > You are setting the Reply-to: field. And complain to GMX if they do not > manage to do duplicate filtering correctly. Ah, I see. But I don't see how to convince thunderbird not to do this. And GMX... :/ So I will just delete the doubles ;) Heads up Harvey