Return-Path: Message-ID: <1329114913.28848.50.camel@aeonflux> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bluetooth: Use more current logging styles From: Marcel Holtmann To: Joe Perches Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" , "David S. Miller" , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:35:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <44b8744770a55924c68f8ad0ca274816d2d6148f.1329102581.git.joe@perches.com> References: <44b8744770a55924c68f8ad0ca274816d2d6148f.1329102581.git.joe@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Joe, > Make functions for bt_info and bt_err. > Remove now unused function bt_printk. > Convert uses of BT_INFO and BT_ERR to bt_info and bt_err. That is all fine, but why not just change BT_INFO to point to bt_info and BT_ERR to bt_err first instead of having this huge patch mixed in with the changes. The size measurement should be no different. > Add newlines to uses of bt_info and bt_err. Why is this a good thing? And in your patch we have bt_err not having \n\n in the end. > Align arguments and coalesce formats. Again, I am not a huge fan to squeeze this all in one patch. > Reduces object sizes a small amount. > (defconfig with bluetooth on and all bluetooth drivers) > > $ size net/bluetooth/built-in.o* > text data bss dec hex filename > 380796 20072 100200 501068 7a54c net/bluetooth/built-in.o.allyesconfig.new > 381595 20072 100184 501851 7a85b net/bluetooth/built-in.o.allyesconfig.old > 126328 1388 132 127848 1f368 net/bluetooth/built-in.o.defconfig.new > 126883 1388 132 128403 1f593 net/bluetooth/built-in.o.defconfig.old > > $ size drivers/bluetooth/built-in.o* > text data bss dec hex filename > 127606 8956 29484 166046 2889e drivers/bluetooth/built-in.o.allyesconfig.new > 129540 8956 29524 168020 29054 drivers/bluetooth/built-in.o.allyesconfig.old > 53033 3260 156 56449 dc81 drivers/bluetooth/built-in.o.defconfig.new > 54390 3260 156 57806 e1ce drivers/bluetooth/built-in.o.defconfig.old Size numbers look good. So I am all for this, but not just in one big patch. Regards Marcel