Return-Path: Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:57:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20120307.225752.1535997011608677011.davem@davemloft.net> To: padovan@profusion.mobi Cc: gustavo@padovan.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, marcel@holtmann.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2012-03-08 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120308054431.GE3998@joana> References: <20120308054431.GE3998@joana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: From: Gustavo Padovan Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 02:44:31 -0300 > Hi Dave, > > Here goes another try to merge the bluetooth-next changes. I looked to the > whole diff of the last pull request and fixed all the style issues you > reported in last pull request attempt. The diff is very big, so I may have > missed some places, but we are, from your coding style point of view, in a > much better state than before. > > Please take a look on it and pull if you find the code suitable, otherwise > tell me what's wrong and how we should fix it since your coding style rules > are not written in CodingStyle. > > About the patches: > - almost half of the patches is in the new Bluetooth Management interface, it > finally reached a stable state regarding its API and we now enable it by > default. > - lots of Bluetooth LE patches. This implementation is still unstable but > disabled by default. > - some L2CAP layer refactoring to make our core code more generic and > reusable. > - New HCI monitor interface to monitor Bluetooth flow. > - Lot of fixes and clean ups all over the Bluetooth subsystem. Pulled, thanks a lot.