Return-Path: Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:55:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Mat Martineau To: Gustavo Padovan , Gustavo Padovan cc: Andrei Emeltchenko , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Another step in l2cap_core/sock separation In-Reply-To: <20120524100228.GP24715@aemeltch-MOBL1> Message-ID: References: <1337821964-4618-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <20120524100228.GP24715@aemeltch-MOBL1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gustavo - On Thu, 24 May 2012, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:12:36PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: >> From: Gustavo Padovan >> >> Hi, >> >> This patchset does a bit more of clean up in l2cap core, it was inially based >> on the two patches Andrei has sent to the list today. > > Can this RFC be merged with other 2 RFC since otherwise I got lost. > > I also found that my mail reader indent your RFC in a strange way so I > thought that they are in the same series. I agree -- using "--chain-reply-to" has made this group of RFC patches very difficult to read in a threaded email view. Would you consider using --no-chain-reply-to with git send-email? -- Mat Martineau Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum