Return-Path: Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:09:37 -0300 From: Gustavo Padovan To: Andrei Emeltchenko , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Gustavo Padovan Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] Bluetooth: Move bt_accept_enqueue() call to l2cap_sock.c Message-ID: <20120524170937.GH3105@joana> References: <1337821964-4618-9-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <1337839374-20443-1-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <1337839374-20443-2-git-send-email-gustavo@padovan.org> <20120524092425.GH24715@aemeltch-MOBL1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20120524092425.GH24715@aemeltch-MOBL1> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andrei, * Andrei Emeltchenko [2012-05-24 12:24:26 +0300]: > Hi Gustavo, > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:02:53AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan > > > > bt_accept_enqueue() can be easily placed at the end of > > l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan > > --- > > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 4 ---- > > net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > > index c9de4f5..5ff294f9 100644 > > --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > > +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c > > @@ -1165,8 +1165,6 @@ static void l2cap_le_conn_ready(struct l2cap_conn *conn) > > bacpy(&bt_sk(sk)->src, conn->src); > > bacpy(&bt_sk(sk)->dst, conn->dst); > > > > - bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk); > > - > > Shall we also move to l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb bacpys above? I don't think so, bacpy and bacmp are used everywhere, they need to fixed differently. Gustavo