Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:40:04 +0300
From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com>
To: Steffen Becker <steffen.becker@tu-ilmenau.de>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: are those patches up-to-date?
Message-ID: <20120524124000.GU24715@aemeltch-MOBL1>
References: <31e819c2c3bf85abeabfbe74e3341826@localhost>
 <20120524101709.GA23856@x220>
 <e321504366890477f93366a9af7f3318@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <e321504366890477f93366a9af7f3318@localhost>
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Steffen,

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Steffen Becker wrote:
> >> So I would like to know if those two patches are up-to-date
> >> (compatibel with bluez4.99) and/or if they are already included in
> >> bluez4.99 (so patching is not necessary) ?
> > 
> > Your question doesn't make much sense as those are both kernel patches
> > and BlueZ 4.99 is a user space component. I think both of those patches
> > can be found in kernel 3.3 and later.
> > 
> > Johan
> 
> Oh thanks, I'm new to linux so my comprehension isn't that well.
> But are you sure with "kernel 3.3" ?
> Because I have gentoo-3.2.12 and thought this is the latest version...

"uname -a" shall give you kernel version.

Best regards 
Andrei Emeltchenko