Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:02:42 +0200
From: Steffen Becker <steffen.becker@tu-ilmenau.de>
To: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: are those patches =?UTF-8?Q?up-to-date=3F?=
In-Reply-To: <20120524101709.GA23856@x220>
References: <31e819c2c3bf85abeabfbe74e3341826@localhost>
 <20120524101709.GA23856@x220>
Message-ID: <e321504366890477f93366a9af7f3318@localhost>
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Johan,

Johan Hedberg schrieb:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> On Thu, May 24, 2012, Steffen Becker wrote:
>> I searched a little in your mail archive on gmane and found
>> something that looks similar to my problem. On 25th January 2011 and
>> 26th October 2011 you pushed out two patches because of a security
>> block issue -> "[PATCH] bluetooth: Fix for security block issue."
>> and "[PATCH] Bluetooth: Revert: Fix L2CAP connection establishment".
>>
>> The postet hcidump message in the second mail (10/26/2011) looks
>> very similar to my hcidump message.
>>
>> So I would like to know if those two patches are up-to-date
>> (compatibel with bluez4.99) and/or if they are already included in
>> bluez4.99 (so patching is not necessary) ?
> 
> Your question doesn't make much sense as those are both kernel patches
> and BlueZ 4.99 is a user space component. I think both of those patches
> can be found in kernel 3.3 and later.
> 
> Johan

Oh thanks, I'm new to linux so my comprehension isn't that well.
But are you sure with "kernel 3.3" ?
Because I have gentoo-3.2.12 and thought this is the latest version...