Return-Path: From: Szymon Janc To: CC: Szymon Janc Subject: [RFC] DBus OutOfBand API update Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:25:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1343226308-443-1-git-send-email-szymon.janc@tieto.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, This is an initial proposal for dbus oob api update for 5.0. I tried to include all comments from previous discussions. I was trying to keep dictionary keys close to what is described in "Bluetooth Secure Simple Pairing Using NFC" whitepaper. But EIR can have other data as well e.g. short name instead of full name, should we distinguish that to know if name resolution should be done in band? Or is this overkill? What about EIR flags? Is it usefull in any sense? Adding data result in DeviceFound signal being emitted, should DeviceDisappeared be emitted when removing oob data (if device was found via oob)? Also, should oob interface be disabled for 2.0 (and for >2.1 with ssp disabled) adapters? Comments? -- BR Szymon Janc Szymon Janc (1): dbusoob: Update API doc/oob-api.txt | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5