Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5050F5A9.5090401@butterbrot.org> <5052519F.30803@butterbrot.org> <50549F3C.8050406@butterbrot.org> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:32:44 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wii Balance Board vs. bluez From: David Herrmann To: Florian Echtler Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Florian On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Herrmann wrote: > Thanks! I have both patches ready for submission. However, could you > actually tell me in what range data is submitted? As I said, I cannot > test these patches. But looking at the code, you get 16bit per value > raw input. You then calculate the per-kg value and multiply it by > 17kg. So I guess you fill up the whole 16bit? > > Your second patch does not adjust the MIN/MAX values for the ABS_HATXY > values and I am just looking for good values here. I just noticed these values aren't forced by the input core so I've just sent the patches to the linux-input ML and put you into CC. Please respond to them with your signed-off-by and tested-by lines as I noted in the comment below each commit-message. Thanks a lot for your work here! If you're working on any userspace programs, I would interested to hear about it. Also feel free to use github.com/dvdhrm/xwiimote for easier communications with the kernel driver. Although, this project is still TODO ;) David