Return-Path: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:15:08 +0300 From: Andrei Emeltchenko To: Mat Martineau Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFCv1 01/15] Bluetooth: Set Exended Flowspec flag for HS chan Message-ID: <20120911081506.GB2597@aemeltch-MOBL1> References: <1346766274-21612-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> <1346766274-21612-2-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Mat, On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Mat Martineau wrote: > > Andrei - > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > > >From: Andrei Emeltchenko > > > >For AMP we always assume EFS L2CAP option. > > > >Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko > >--- > >include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 2 ++ > >net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 7 ++++++- > >2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h > >index 161be83..3ec8679 100644 > >--- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h > >+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h > >@@ -508,6 +508,8 @@ struct l2cap_chan { > > __u32 remote_acc_lat; > > __u32 remote_flush_to; > > > >+ __u8 ctrl_id; > >+ > > How about "remote_amp_id" instead of ctrl_id? The channel move code > tracks local_amp_id. > Why does the remote controller id need to be > tracked? I think you are right, I think it shall be local AMP controller id. So we can keep this name ctrl_id for local one or do you think local_amp_id is better? Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko