Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bluetooth.h: fix compile issue when using in C++
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
Cc: iwamatsu@debian.org,
	pkg-bluetooth-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org,
	"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1346866033.17971.4.camel@belkin4>
References: <1343832093.2121.0.camel@belkin4>
	 <20120727163853.GA11847@odin.tremily.us>
	 <1330953167.3457.13.camel@pohly-mobl1.fritz.box>
	 <20120817051852.GA32453@odin.tremily.us>
	 <20120827234054.GA7793@x220.sheraton.com>
	 <1346866033.17971.4.camel@belkin4>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ww9tIwL1STkDe5DBHArR"
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:56:23 +0200
Message-ID: <1346867783.17971.5.camel@belkin4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>


--=-ww9tIwL1STkDe5DBHArR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

El mi=C3=A9, 05-09-2012 a las 19:27 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3:
> El lun, 27-08-2012 a las 16:40 -0700, Johan Hedberg escribi=C3=B3:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:41:33PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > > El dom, 29-07-2012 a las 09:52 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3:
> > > > > Today I got a report downstream showing that old problem:
> > > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/22306
> > > > >=20
> > > > > is still not fixed.=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Could you please commit debian patch to fix this?
> > > > > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/bluez/4.101-1/0=
9_fix_ftbfs_with_c99.patch
> > > >=20
> > > > Any news about this? Thanks
> > >=20
> > > Bump :)
> >=20
> > The patch would need to be sent as a proper git patch to this mailing
> > list. Particularly, we need proper author information for the patch as
> > well as a commit message explaining the background to the patch and why
> > it is correct (including a reference to the C++ standard and/or gcc
> > documentation).
> >=20
> > Johan
> >=20
>=20
> Will forward this message to patch authors and debian maintainers to let
> them reformat it with proper authoring.

Umm, it could be a gcc bug per:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D786966#c5


--=-ww9tIwL1STkDe5DBHArR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlBHkkcACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RTsgCffUUC/PjQ8hAJ4sgz2JlNEdOR
ACUAnROJzdDFsGFGKUlTtPwMB/siScUj
=k3gO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ww9tIwL1STkDe5DBHArR--