Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1349383353-16733-1-git-send-email-lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> References: <1349383353-16733-1-git-send-email-lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 23:57:51 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ] gdbus: Fix invalid memory access while unregistering From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: Lucas De Marchi Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Lucas, On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > If an interface is added and removed on the same mailoop iteration, > ObjectManager would try to send InterfacesAdded signal while running the > idler because the interface was added to data->added list. > > This is easily reproduced by forcing an error path in a plugin > registration, like on sap_server_register(), resulting in the following > error: > > ==11795== Invalid read of size 4 > ==11795== at 0x496F592: dbus_message_iter_append_basic (dbus-message.c:2598) > ==11795== by 0x117B39: append_interface (object.c:554) > ==11795== by 0x48955E7: g_slist_foreach (gslist.c:840) > ==11795== by 0x11923B: process_changes (object.c:592) > ==11795== by 0x11956D: generic_unregister (object.c:980) > ==11795== by 0x4973BAC: _dbus_object_tree_unregister_and_unlock (dbus-object-tree.c:516) > ==11795== by 0x4965240: dbus_connection_unregister_object_path (dbus-connection.c:5776) > ==11795== by 0x1178A5: object_path_unref (object.c:1219) > ==11795== by 0x118517: g_dbus_unregister_interface (object.c:1344) > ==11795== by 0x19AF5B: sap_exit (sap.c:385) > ==11795== by 0x13E9E2: sap_server_register (server.c:1428) > ==11795== by 0x13C092: sap_server_probe (manager.c:44) > > With this patch we don't send the InterfacesAdded signal, removing it > from data->added while unregistering. > --- > gdbus/object.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gdbus/object.c b/gdbus/object.c > index c63a26d..444728c 100644 > --- a/gdbus/object.c > +++ b/gdbus/object.c > @@ -657,6 +657,17 @@ static gboolean remove_interface(struct generic_data *data, const char *name) > return TRUE; > } > > + /* > + * Interface being removed was just added, on the same mainloop > + * iteration? Don't send any signal > + */ > + if (g_slist_find(data->added, iface)) { > + data->added = g_slist_remove(data->added, iface); > + g_free(iface->name); > + g_free(iface); > + return TRUE; > + } > + > data->removed = g_slist_prepend(data->removed, iface->name); > g_free(iface); > > -- > 1.7.12.2 Ack, gonna apply it tomorrow in case of no objections. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz