Return-Path: Message-ID: <5194E380.1030109@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:47:44 -0400 From: Peter Hurley MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Holler CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marcel Holtmann , Gustavo Padovan , Johan Hedberg , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: tty: memory corruption through tty_release/tty_ldisc_release References: <519480A1.6030909@ahsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <519480A1.6030909@ahsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed List-ID: On 05/16/2013 02:45 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Hello, > > after some pain because the "big step" (ecbbfd4) happened while the support for my AMD CPU was broken and thus git bisect hit a series of kernels which didn't boot, I've finally found the cause for a memory corruption: tty_ldisc_release(). > > What happens is the following: > > tty_port is self-destructing, that means it destroys itself in tty_port.c:tty_port_destructor() when the last reference is gone. E.g. in case of rfcomm this happens with the call to tty->ops->close() in tty_io.c:tty_release(). > > The problem here is that tty_io.c:tty_release() calls tty_ldisc.c:tty_ldisc_release() which uses the tty_port to flush the ldisc work queues. > > In the best case this hits a BUG() in cancel_work_sync() but often it just causes a memory corruption without a BUG() got hit before. Hi Alexander, Actually, the problem is that tty->ops->close() shouldn't be the last kref on the port. It doesn't look to me like device removal is being handled properly. Regards, Peter Hurley