Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1374780864-8529-1-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org> References: <1374776057-2618-1-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org> <1374780864-8529-1-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:27:17 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix removing Long Term Key From: Claudio Takahasi To: BlueZ development Cc: Vinicius Gomes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Vinicius: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Claudio Takahasi wrote: > This patch fixes authentication failure on LE link re-connection when > BlueZ acts as slave (peripheral). LTK is removed from the internal list > after its first use causing PIN or Key missing reply when re-connecting > the link. The LE Long Term Key Request event indicates that the master > is attempting to encrypt or re-encrypt the link. > > Pre-condition: BlueZ host paired and running as slave. > How to reproduce(master): > 1) Establish an ACL LE encrypted link > 2) Disconnect the link > 3) Try to re-establish the ACL LE encrypted link (fails) > >> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 19 > LE Connection Complete (0x01) > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 > Role: Slave (0x01) > ... > @ Device Connected: 00:02:72:DC:29:C9 (1) flags 0x0000 >> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 13 > LE Long Term Key Request (0x05) > Handle: 64 > Random number: 875be18439d9aa37 > Encryption diversifier: 0x76ed > < HCI Command: LE Long Term Key Request Reply (0x08|0x001a) plen 18 > Handle: 64 > Long term key: 2aa531db2fce9f00a0569c7d23d17409 >> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 6 > LE Long Term Key Request Reply (0x08|0x001a) ncmd 1 > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 >> HCI Event: Encryption Change (0x08) plen 4 > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 > Encryption: Enabled with AES-CCM (0x01) > ... > @ Device Disconnected: 00:02:72:DC:29:C9 (1) reason 3 > < HCI Command: LE Set Advertise Enable (0x08|0x000a) plen 1 > Advertising: Enabled (0x01) >> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 4 > LE Set Advertise Enable (0x08|0x000a) ncmd 1 > Status: Success (0x00) >> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 19 > LE Connection Complete (0x01) > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 > Role: Slave (0x01) > ... > @ Device Connected: 00:02:72:DC:29:C9 (1) flags 0x0000 >> HCI Event: LE Meta Event (0x3e) plen 13 > LE Long Term Key Request (0x05) > Handle: 64 > Random number: 875be18439d9aa37 > Encryption diversifier: 0x76ed > < HCI Command: LE Long Term Key Request Neg Reply (0x08|0x001b) plen 2 > Handle: 64 >> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 6 > LE Long Term Key Request Neg Reply (0x08|0x001b) ncmd 1 > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 >> HCI Event: Disconnect Complete (0x05) plen 4 > Status: Success (0x00) > Handle: 64 > Reason: Authentication Failure (0x05) > @ Device Disconnected: 00:02:72:DC:29:C9 (1) reason 0 > > Signed-off-by: Claudio Takahasi > --- > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > index ae78738..124a5e2 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > @@ -3558,7 +3558,13 @@ static void hci_le_ltk_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > > hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_LE_LTK_REPLY, sizeof(cp), &cp); > > - if (ltk->type & HCI_SMP_STK) { > + /* > + * Ref. Bluetooth Core SPEC pages 1975 and 2004. STK is a temporary > + * key used to encrypt a connection following pairing. It is used > + * during the Encrypted Session Setup to distribute the keys. Later, > + * security can be re-established using a distributed LTK. > + */ > + if (ltk->type == HCI_SMP_STK_SLAVE) { > list_del(<k->list); > kfree(ltk); > } > -- > 1.7.11.7 > Do you see another alternative? Is it feasible to avoid adding the STK in the list without adding a complex logic? Regards, Claudio